I am going to take a wild guess that you are not a history major. And what does 2003 have to do with Kerry Wood ? Gotcha. Good lord. 2003 and Kerry Wood was used as comparison to show Riggleman's usage of Wood wasn't nearly as egregious as other instances we have seen, since you attacked Riggleman on that basis. Quite frankly, I'd also take Riggleman over any of the other managers in the past 15+ years. At least unlike others, he has shown the willingness to recognize his mistakes and correct them. Maybe he's a student of history. That's not even beginning to touch the fact that holding up all recent Cubs managers to the same standard doesn't work when many of them had relatively little to work with. Especially when you realize Pineilla and Baker had more talent under them than any other Cubs managers in most of our lifetimes. Both Baker and Piniella have been a victim of circumstance to some degree, but unlike the truly great managers, both demonstrated not only a clear inability to mitigate bad situations, but the tendency to compound them. The basis for your defense of Lou is feeble. The team would have been bad either way, but Lou's management has been laughably bad, as he has consistently failed to make the obvious choices. Lee still batting third is emblematic of the decision making as a whole this season. It's immaterial at this point, but if the team were in a tight race, Lou's foibles could easily have been the difference between being in the playoffs and watching them. No doubt you'll reference the Soto issue yet again, but it has gone far beyond that all year. It's been a litany of boneheaded moves and willful ignorance of the obvious.