What's so hard is probably Denver has no intentions of actually dealing him, and that throwing EVERYTHING at them could be a mistake - depending what EVERYTHING means. With or without Cutler, the Bears need offensive line help, wide receivers and defensive upgrades. If they were to trade 2 firsts and a second, plus Orton, where would that leave them? A franchise QB would be a godsend, but without the ability to field a team around him, that QB isn't going to shine all that brightly. As to the comment that the Bears have never had a good-great QB at any point, McMahon was good, Harbaugh was good, Kramer was good for a bit, Miller was as well. They've had good QBs. The problem is they haven't had good QB's for any extended period of time, and when they did, briefly, the only time it coincided with the rest of the team being good enough to really contend, was with McMahon. Clearly they've never had a great QB. This year's 1st. Next year's 1st & 3rd. Orton. All we would really need to get started is a WR, which we could go after in the 3rd, and a RT, which we could look into in the 2nd round or the remaining FA's. The rest of the picks you use on D, either depth or finding a starter or two in the rough, which Angelo is already decent at. I'd be willing to accept slightly worse defense, but with our current core of defensive players we should still be able to be better than Denver's D was. We've got the running game and TE. I don't think we're that far away from having a really good offense with Cutler. I'd throw much at Denver, not everything of course.