Dungy was criticized by many for not being a good game coach. They derided his philosophy of "do what we do" and refusal to make adjustments especially in playoff games when other teams were throwing in new wrinkles. I'm not sure I completely buy it, but it's out there. I don't remember Dungy being criticized for timeout/challenge issues like Lovie is though. The timeout and challenge issues aren't that big of a deal. The timeouts being used early hasn't cost the Bears a game. The challenges only cost the Bears the Redskins game last year, and they still ended up with a home game for a chance to go to the Superbowl. Sure it's pretty bad to watch and see early timeouts each half and bad challenges, but that's way down on the list of the things coaches need to be able to do well. We've been fortunate that the timeouts haven't cost us. Truth is that we haven't been in very many games where we needed them with 2 minutes left in a half. I like Lovie overall, but I agree that he has pretty vanilla philosophy, which, IMO, was magnified by Anegelo's vanilla appraoch to talent evaluation and retention. It resulted in some decent seasons. Improvements can be made -- and need to be made -- but Lovie's "system" could be worse. It could be Jauron's.