Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Soul

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    44,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Soul

  1. Glad we can stop listening to the press whine and cry about Lovie and "his money." This deal was a foregone conclusion from the beginning.
  2. http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm The bolded isn't even close to true. I'm not exactly sure how you can be sure of that-there has been no report that says that the Bears are likely to pay Lovie what his value is. That doesn't mean it still won't happen, but it's certainly not a sure thing that they are willing to pay him 5 million. Perhaps not, but I did hear a report on Comcast this week that the Bears were up to $4million. Certainly more than earlier reports that had them sitting at a stupid and insulting $2million. Some are speculating that the Bears will announce the new Lovie deal on the eve of the Bears convention.
  3. Because after all is said and done, there is no accounting for Steve Trout. :(
  4. NOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooo. That is all.
  5. Looks like cable may keep MLB EI because they finally decided to play ball: Cable's tight sphincter is legendary. MLB had to carry through on their threat before they finally agreed to give their subscribers ONE additional channel. LOL, unbelievable.
  6. Who else has the proven track record of winning that Cuban has? Among the prospective buyers, I mean. Zell has been in the background to Reinsdorf, right? That doesn't count.
  7. I'd love to be suprised and see Dempster come back to form, but I'm struggling to find closers who collapsed and then returned to form so quickly -- within half a season. I know Mesa, but he took years.
  8. The key is explaining. Throw up top ten lists and compare the players. There's plenty of time to show graphics that would help people understand previously unheard of stats. A QB rating means nothing unless you see them repeatedly and realize what the better QBs would have. Likewise, if you never heard of OBP you might think a .315 OBP is good, because you think a .315 AVG is good. The first time you see an OPS, you have no idea whether 750 is good or bad. But if people keep showing it, and giving examples of good, bad or average, others will learn. What's not helpful is whiny coots telling people there's no place in baseball for these stats. I can't disagree. Why would anyone want to simply exclude something from all discussion? Even if it's a stat someone came up with that ultimately proved to be of little value, at least talk about it and come to that conclusion before simply lopping it off at the head.
  9. I don't have a problem with new stats. By all means, come up with whatever statistics you want. I fail to see how that affects anyone negatively. However, when one fan starts touting his incredible knowledge of every stat in the universe, and then uses it to declare that another person isn't as good a fan because he/she doesn't know about all of them, then that's where I draw the line. Stat snobbery is bogus.
  10. You are right, of course. I think it's overblown that Cuban is somehow 'bad' for the NBA though. He's been an incredible boon for Dallas, and has increased the level of interest immensely. Sure David Stern doesn't like him. Notice he tolerates him though -- because Cuban's raking in dollars and ratings with that Mavs team. That's part of the politics, too.
  11. I think this is the year, but who knows. At any rate the Mavs turnaround has been incredible.
  12. Cuban is exactly what this franchise needs to finally shed the loser reputation that permeates everything we try to accomplish.
  13. this is about new york still hating ronny. freaking trash.
  14. I think that's the overriding factor here. Santo has re-invented his image here in Chicago. He's a completely different figure than he was in his playing days, when he was known as a competitor that wouldn't hesitate to get under your skin. Chicago may view him as the personification of the 'lovable loser', but the rest of the country -- particularly New York -- still thinks of him as a jerk who is getting what he deserved all along.
  15. From what I saw last year, Murton has real difficulty judging some balls in the air -- especially when he gets near the wall. His arm is horrid. Soriano I have no idea about (which is an uncomfortable feeling), and Jones is pretty blah defensively. If we can just be average out there it will be all that can be expected, IMO.
  16. .....and no sooner did I say we're playing well without Noc, they start to SUCK and show why we need him in there.
  17. The nation ain't buying it. Prior will have to start 25+ games this year before people start believing again. There's no doubt about it but you can't argue that Prior starting a ST game isn't news. Good news. Good news, yes. Meaningful in the grand scheme of things? Not in and of itself.
  18. While I agree that's what teams like Pitt & KC must do to succeed, I think the larger question is whether teams should be relegated to this sort of "shoot the moon" philosophy while the Yanks and BoSox just win every year due to their spending. Of course, nothing can account for spending tons of money badly, which is what the Cubs do.
  19. Isn't that already the case? Aren't teams like the D-Rays, Royals, Pirates just basically farming up players for other teams to eventually pluck off their rosters?
  20. When we see Prior pitching a regular season game and doing well, then he's back.
  21. I know, but what is damning for Skiles is when players who were struggling here go to other cities and play much better. Skiles is a particular style of coach. He's also a shooter from way back. It's not a suprise then that his teams are basically reliant on the shooter and can't develop a big man. The only question in my mind is, can we win a title with Skiles? I don't think so.
  22. I can hear the sound of Nats season tickets being canceled all the way back here in Wisconsin.
  23. I don't think Blanco can be considered insurance against losing Barrett. Blanco is a defensive alternative, nothing more -- he's there to give the primary catcher a game off every once in awhile. Barrett's a top catcher on the offensive side -- something which is rather rare and would command very good dollars on the open market, IMO.
  24. Wow, BP really thinks were going to score that many runs? I wouldn't have guessed that.
  25. Neither Brady nor Russell are sure things, IMO.
×
×
  • Create New...