Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Soul

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    44,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Soul

  1. that is actually hypothermia... sorry Liar!
  2. Everything in life is relative. Rich Hill is incosistent compared to who? Speaking of HRs Lilly has been giving them up a pretty good clip. His own demonstrated capabilities? did you misunderstand the question or are you avoiding it? Every pitcher is inconsistent. A player with a 3.00 ERA doesn't give up 2 Rs over 6 innings every time out. There are gems and poundings mixed in with decent and below average outings. Demonstrate how this doesn't describe Rich Hill and most every other ML SP, please. What? He said everything was relative and then asked who Rich Hill was inconsistent compared to. My response was his own demonstrated capabilities, ie - he's been much better for periods of time than he has for stretches this season. What am I avoiding? I never said Rich was some kind of anomaly compared to other pitchers. you're right that that's the definition of inconsistency. But if he isn't any more or less consistent than the bulk of the rest of the league it doesn't mean a single thing. Taken literally, of course you're right. But I'm not sure that it matters, since no one in the Hill-is-Inconsistent camp can back up the value of their claim. The only thing I'm willing to say is that I hope Hill is consistently better in the future. I don't see a lot of arm problems for him, so I'm hoping he just tweaks his craft enough that we see more good starts and fewer blowups. I can say the same about Marshall though, the same about any of our younger pitchers where I see some upside that hasn't yet been fully explored.
  3. I don't think anybody, he would be a call up. Sorry, I mean in terms of reps. Only so many innings that can be pitched. Who would get fewer appearances in favor of Sam...
  4. Isn't this a little soon? Who would he be replacing anyway?
  5. Big 2-run homer coming to tie it. I can feel these things in my bones when it rains.
  6. I'm guessing their fans would say Papi. Me too. For the Cubs, I'd go Z first Damn last year this could have been Neifi. In that case maybe we should just make it Woo Woo and cut our losses.
  7. To be fair, Gaetti had a good season with the Cubs, and was pretty good during his Twins days. yeah, i posted that thinking the original thread was just ex-cubs. he probably doesn't belong and really, gaetti had a good 1/2 season. 1999 was horrible It was a half-season yeah, and actually I think Gaetti would be one of those guys Cards fans could point to and say "see? works both ways." But we'll just ignore him and continue with our thread 8-)
  8. Yeah it may have been a poor one, but I tried to get across a point. Pujols may have been telling the truth, but it doesn't make him less of a jerk. The opinion is a matter of bias. In terms of human character, two incidents in which he criticizes the nature of an award within his profession and the skill of an opponent he just faced says much less about someone than one of the game's premier superstars having a reputation for being courteous and welcoming to its fans. He's a Cardinal, and he has enjoyed much success against the Cubs this weekend. That's why I hate him, and that's why you think his opinions make him a jerk. No. It's all black and white, and Red is the devil's color.
  9. Oh yeah, and the maddening thing about Brock was he wasn't very good with us at all. Then he goes from us to the Cards, mid-season, and it wasn't like he waited for another year or two of development to kick in. Oh no, that would be too logical. Instead he starts tearing up for the Cards immediately, and really never looked back. Brock never hit over 100 OPS+ for us, ever. He didn't dip under 100 OPS+ for the Cards until 1977, well into his senior years as a pro. And he went from 77 to 146 midseason, magically, in his trade year. If there was ever an example of this, it's Brock. Good call.
  10. 5.18 ERA, 1.50 WHIP. I'd say Cardinal Magic did not work on Mr. Weaver. I take it you missed the playoffs? I tried to avoid it, but yeah that's where the pixie dust kicked in with Weaver.
  11. I'm guessing their fans would say Papi. Me too. For the Cubs, I'd go Z first
  12. No they don't, thats not the new rules. I didn't think so either, but I'd be happy to switch to the McSkullet rules in this case. Call Selig.
  13. Fernando Vina. .266/.339/.331 his last year with the Crew. Hit .300/.380/398 his first year with StL, .303/.357/.418 his second. He was out of the league after a brief stint with Detroit where he sucked in '04. He did fade a bit his last 2 seasons with the Cards though.
  14. Crapola. Root for the D-Backs tonight.
  15. I actually get a kick out of your sig dude, but don't you think in retrospect it wasn't the worst move in the world for Lou? At the very least it took some of the media pressure off the team at a time when they needed it. Lol yea I need to find a new one but havent had time to look. I was at Sat game and Ive never heard Wrigley as loud as it was on Wards grand slam. Its 2 days since, and I still hve no voice lol Haha, yeah there's nothing like that :) I lost my voice on the Lee fight too, I was right in back of the visiting dugout you should have heard the crowd when Young walked off the field.
  16. I actually get a kick out of your sig dude, but don't you think in retrospect it wasn't the worst move in the world for Lou? At the very least it took some of the media pressure off the team at a time when they needed it.
  17. Looking at the radar maps, they could get this one in without a delay possibly. Expand out to the national radar. Ahh, that was my undoing. I think it'll take longer than an hour and a half from now (one hour into the game) for that mess to get to Wrigley. http://www.weather.com/outlook/travel/businesstraveler/map/interactive/60613?from=36hour_map_large&zoom=7&interactiveMapLayer=radar If the stuff directly to the south/southwest stays away from Wrigley, that stuff in Iowa shouldn't be an issue for a long time. Over the course of an hour the front edge didn't move a whole heck of a lot, according to the radar loop. Unfortunately that stuff between Aurora and Joliet looks like it might head toward Wrigley pretty quickly. That's OK. We'll muscle up 6 quickies and leave StL weeping as the game is called after it's official. I got my magic 8 ball out today. It's totally confirmed :wink:
  18. No more sinking back down. No more I say!
  19. I'd rather see Soriano hit further down, but the guy doesn't do as well and doesn't want to. Kind of sucks. Theriot would appear to be the best leadoff option, easily.
  20. Amazing. They're doing this interview with Mo Vaughn. And I can't believe how quickly I had forgotten about Mo. When did he leave MLB?
  21. Just a tad north of the Chicago dot.
×
×
  • Create New...