Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Soul

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    44,478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Soul

  1. that's an impressive list, but the bears need to go early with an o-lineman if they keep their first pick. The O-line should be the offseason's #1 priority, I agree. Drafting a RB high would be a huge mistake. I pray Angelo isn't even thinking about it.
  2. nah not likely, TSN prefers defense over offense. Soto and Blanco are both pretty damn good defensivley, and the fact that Soto should actually produce some offense, its very likely the Cubs will have the 2nd or 3rd best production in the NL from Catcher. I can't accept that Soto will produce offensively yet. Not a big enough sample size @ MLB level. Here's hoping he does, he would be an amazing NL catcher if he brought his defense to the table and doubled it up with a little O.
  3. Anyone interested in Joe Flacco @ QB? He played for Delaware -- I picked up on him when they played against the Salukis in the playoffs. He murdered them on seemingly every play with incredible throws. He's tall 6'6" I believe, has a rocket arm, which he proved in a recent college QB competition (I believe he threw it the longest). He seems to possess good improvisational ability from what I've seen. I'm not big on spending a top pick for QB because we need OL. Looking for a possible bargain pickup here. A Romo kind of guy who can sit for a couple years and see what happens.
  4. How can they possibly have SD that high on the list? Both their catchers are horrible defensively at a position where defense is the primary skill.
  5. Ugh, I don't envy the day of opening up hundreds of IE windows and trying to score tix when I need to get work done :( Brewer tix go on sale Feb 23rd, BTW. I like the idea of a Saturday rather than a Friday. That's going to be one ticket-hounding-madness weekend.
  6. That's what I think. It sounds like there's a population of Modzilla victims @ Desipio.
  7. "Can anyone be this good"?!??! That's hilarious. Unless you have like A-Rod or Pujols on the cover, that quote does not belong. At the time he was hot. To me this merely illustrates (excuse the pun) the danger of taking a player's first few months in the league and drawing conclusions from it.
  8. Yeah, it pains me to admit it but I think there's a solid chance this team stays below .500 for a good while. It's amazing how quickly a Super Bowl team developed needs up & down the roster.
  9. Exactly. Imagine if someone came on here the morning that Z re-signed claiming to know Z's agent and that a deal was about to get done (when nobody saw much of a chance of something getting done with Z). They would have a cult-like following on here and people would hang on every word. Actually, this sort of happened. Somebody scooped the Z deal the night before it happened when nobody thought it would happen during the season :D. Heh, I actually would've completely missed it. I was at the doc getting my broken nose fixed that day. What happened? This was posted by BleacherBadger the night before Z was signed: People of course were skeptical until the next day, but the info was still very well appreciated, and the next time BleacherBadger picks up something I hope people will still be skeptical, but remember that he already scooped that. In fairness though, this post is full of qualifiers. He's very clearly labeling it as rumor, something that isn't known for sure. That's much, much different from posting "done deal" on your front page.
  10. Hehe. You numbers homers, you. :P
  11. LOL, desipio is awesome. I've never been there before. Is that where all of Modzilla's disgruntled victims go to die? :thumbsup:
  12. You mean your Grandfather's barber? LOL. hehe, yeah that was good. I had to think it through for a few seconds.
  13. What's great about this thread is if you take any sizeable range of pages, you get the entire content of the thread in condensed form. So if you want to know what's going on, just read pages 10-40 or 110-140. Little difference.
  14. McNamee apparently delivered physical evidence that Clemens roided up: http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-07-clemensfeb07,1,6445449.story Seems mighty strange to save medical supplies for that long, but who knows.
  15. True, but even after 172 pages we still don't have a real clue what the deal would be.
  16. So does the "I always heard this place sucks" argument rise to the level of the "Hitler" argument? -- i.e. you use it, you lose it.
  17. well, he hasn't been good since 2003. that's one issue Unfortunately a rather serious one at that.
  18. It's been reeeaaaal interesting for the past month and a half. :P
  19. *brain explodes* No seriously though, I would need to actually spend some time to evaluate whether I think it's a worthy stat or not. I guess for now I'll take everyone's word for it. Don't laugh. Most fans of the NFL still think QB Rating is a valid individual stat. Heck, most *experts* still fail to mention how dependent it is on the performances of other team members. There are all kinds of stats out there that people just accept as good stats, when really they aren't.
  20. And that's when you know it's time to walk away... Indeed.
  21. There's actually some good baseball discussion hidden amongst all the Jesse, though. I saw most of it. It's always interesting to see players who are perceived differently than their numbers show (or, at the very least, *some* of their stats). This happens quite often in baseball -- and there's always someone who won't consider that their perception might be wrong. I freely admit to being guilty of this in the past, as well.
  22. I know you all will love the cryptic quotes from the O's guys. Hahah. Nice.
  23. League average EqA = .260 (it's built so this ALWAYS happens). League average OPS+ is 100...so a .271 EqA probably translates to arounda a 104 OPS+. I really need to read up on more stats. But I really don't like spending much time studying them. I'm too right-brain for it. Thanks for the explanation.
×
×
  • Create New...