This is the one area where I take some issue with the argument that the Cubs should trade Zambrano for financial reasons. According to BA (subscription only), the Cubs spent $4,044,200 on this year's draft. The Nationals came in at #1 as the top spender at $11,511,500. Now, in fairness, they handed out a historically large contract to Strasburg and also had a second first round pick in Drew Storen. Only one other team handed out anything close to that (Mariners at $10.9m). While the Cubs were on the low end of the spectrum, there was only a few million separating the Cubs from being in the Top 5 in draft spending (the Padres clocked in at #5 with $9.1m). While this is a substantial amount of money in real terms, I don't think the Cubs need to dump Zambrano just to clear up the space needed to be a team that spends a lot of money on the draft and in player development. The new ownership was going to divert existing resources to doing exactly that. I don't think the Cubs need to use all of the $17.875m owed to Zambrano in order to strengthen the farm system. The resources needed to do that are available to the Cubs; they just need to divert or develop those resources accordingly. Plus, as we have seen in the past, successful drafts don't have to involve throwing around money like a teenage billionaire. I'm fine with the idea of trading Zambrano, waiting a year or two, and using the money to splurge in free agency. However, I don't think the Cubs need to trade him in order to put together a better farm system.