It's part of the reason why I'm back and forth on how to evaluate him (and Ayers, to a lesser extent). On the one hand, he has the sort of present toolkit that says "4th OF in his prime" because you're not entirely sure where his power/hit tool are going to end up once he starts facing ML-quality pitching on the regular, but his defense/speed are strong enough to be an asset off the bench. On the other hand, he's met every challenge, and now that he's in AA and producing, the power/hit concerns are not as prevalent as they were earlier this year. This isn't the sort of thing that comes along frequently enough to build a reliable career projection arc, ya know?
I'm still skeptical about the notion that he could regularly be a 15/20 HR threat in the majors, and there's always the chance he falls flat on his face at some point, but even if his bat ends up comparable to Nico's and he's regularly putting up 100ish wRC+ while keeping up his defense and baserunning, that's good enough (although admittedly not ideal) to merit a starting corner OF spot.
The fun question I have right now is how to rank Hartshorn, Ayers, Conrad, and him in the system. I get the sense that, by the time the AFL wraps up, all four will be in consideration for various publications' Top 100 lists, and that's admittedly a really fun notion.