This one is just too easy to hammer, i mean i read that word UNPRECEDENTED and thats just too easy. How bout... Roger Clemens 2001 CG=O Barry Zito 2002 CG=1 Clemens has pitched 3 CG in his last 7 years. Peavy pitched in 27 games and had 166 IP. Maybe that might have something to do with him not winning last year. Clemens will probably pitch another 8 games and 50 IP bringing it to 214 IP like he did last year. OK. I stand corrected. CLEMENS can win the Cy Young Award without finishing a single game. Nobody else is allowed to apparently. So in the scenerio stated above (Peavy vs. Clemens), where the innings favored Clemens, innings DO matter. Yet this year (Clemens vs. Carpenter), when the innings DON'T favor Clemens, then we'll ignore them? Isn't that convenient? You're telling me that Peavy lost last year because of fewer innings, even though he had a far superior ERA? OK, then why shouldn't Clemens lose this year because of fewer innings, even though he has a better ERA? You can't have it both ways. Oh i forgort Clemens won the Cy Young last year with no CG. Last year Clemens was on a playoff conteder Peavy wasnt he also helped his team win more games than Peavy did. If Clemens didnt pitch those extra games they wouldn not have made the playoffs. He pitched 50 more IP than Peavy not 16. ERA shouldnt tell the whole story and neither should IP. The difference in IP of roger/carp is a lot smaller than the difference in ERA. They both have lost 4 games while Carp has won 6 more but i think its been stated pretty clearly as to why he has won 6 more than roger.