It probably has something to do with the fact that he's a good manager. Have some perspective, think about how the Cubs did the season before Lou got here, look at what he did the 2 full seasons he was here, think of all the attributes about this ballclub that immediately changed when he came aboard. Then think of all the injuries and turmoil we've had this year. No one in their right mind would consider all that, and then fire a manager 25% into the season when his team is above .500 Well, the 2007 team had a lot more talent than the 2006 team. I'd say that had more to do with the increase in wins, rather than Lou being on the bench. Yes it did, but talent alone isn't enough. Who was the one that finally gave players like Theriot and Soto a shot to play every day? Who was the manager that turned one of the least patient teams in baseball into the most (in 2008)? None of the "talent" we gained between 06 and 07 was all that renowned for patient hitting and getting on base at a high clip. Just two of several examples that illustrate why Lou is night and day better than Dusty Baker as a manager, and beyond that, one of the better managers in baseball.