Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    93,914
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. Are you sure no Lee? KingCubsfan in the other thread said he had him in his top 10. I'm not surprised about no Cubs-I'm not sure Szczur would make his top 100, and he doesn't think all that highly of Jackson either. Nevermind I glanced right over his name...my bad
  2. Keith Law put up his top 50 prospects at midseason. His list has no Cubs in the top 50 or honorable mentions, and no Lee on it as well.
  3. Bearclaw, I respect your argument because although it is vastly different from mine, it is thought out. But it's wrong. No one here is salivating over walks because they are walks. No one here is saying a walk is better than a hit, even a single. You seem to know the psychology between batter and pitcher in an AB, but you basically dismiss the fact that the batter has the ability to read pitches and go after or lay off them. It's not the walk that means something, its what having a high walk total stands for, which is pitch selectivity. There are exceptions to the rule (Bradley almost seemed too selective out there. Fukudome at times too) but a majority of the time if you have a high OBP/walk total, you are a pretty good hitter. Also Id be willing to bet that there is a higher coorelation between team OBP and runs scored than team BA and runs scored. Anyways, a lot of you guys can present the argument much better. Just my 2 cents.
  4. I had completely forgotten just how bad Guillen was. For some reason I thought he was a decent player. The funny thing is, he was so bad that I actually believed that .286 career SLG number. It's actually .386....still bad but not epically bad. According to B-R, it's actually .338, with a career OPS of .626. Yeah sorry I meant they said his SLG was .238, but it was really .338
  5. I dunno, him doing weird stuff doesnt seem all that cool anymore. He's trying too hard to be weird.
  6. He was great in game 1 and good in games 2 and 5, awful in games 3 and 4
  7. I had completely forgotten just how bad Guillen was. For some reason I thought he was a decent player. The funny thing is, he was so bad that I actually believed that .286 career SLG number. It's actually .386....still bad but not epically bad.
  8. Am I reading this right? You would trade Marmol for Colby Rasmus? He's a career .259 hitter, doesn't get on base at a real good level, doesn't steal bases, and is only a 20 HR power guy. I've got to believe you're massively overrating his trade value.. Maybe I am wrong? I mean, I think Jackson could be brought up and put up similar numbers w/ a bit less power. Colby was the #3 prospect in baseball 2 years ago, and had a pretty solid .859 OPS in his first full season in the bigs. His .363 OBP last year seems to show that he can get on base at least slightly above average (not sure what his isolated discipline was but he his OBP was ~90 points higher than his BA). He has had a tough season but he's only 24 and I believe is pretty good in CF. If they are giving up on a player like that, I would trade an overpaid closer for him, as much as I loved Marmol during his time here.
  9. Casey Coleman gave them a 4.11 ERA in 12 appearances (8 starts) last year (albeit with dubious peripherals). Considering he could easily be shuffled back and forth from Iowa without complaint, I don't think you can fault the Cubs for thinking Coleman could have been an injury replacement in the rotation. Then despite how much we hate Doug Davis, they probably expected that he had at least a shot to contribute if we were missing 2 starters at once. He had awful numbers last year with Milwaukee, but signing him to a minor league deal to see if he can put up an ERA in the low to mid 4's like he had in the previous 3 years prior to 2010 wasn't a bad thought overall. I'm sure they didn't expect Thomas Diamond to go from ERAs of 4.20 and 3.16 in 09 and 10 to 8.66 this year. I doubt they thought Jay Jackson would go from a top 100 prospect to start 2010 to an ERA over 6. Austin Bibens-Dirkx going from 3.27 ERA to 4.61 to 7.16 this year. Mathes gonig from 3.62 to 5.44 to 9.07 this year. The Cubs came in thinking their contingency plan would include Coleman, Davis, and someone from the AAA rotation stepping up. Instead every single starter in AAA has completely regressed to the point where a team desperate for starting pitching could not justify bringing up any of those guys in Iowa.
  10. Thata boy Castro. Game 1's at Wrigley guys.
  11. This is your fault. I'll feel pretty horrible if that starts a chain of events that leads to an AL comeback.
  12. That was awful...he had his feet set, it was a routine throw and he just threw it into the dirt and Votto is not Carlos Pena at 1st.
  13. Boo, that sucked. Also that graphic comparing Starlin Castro to the great SS's of the past was awful. It was comparing 2 things, BA and hits in the first 214 games of a career. I'm all about comparing Starlin to greats, but yeah
  14. I'm so scared that Castro is going to field a grounder and bounce one towards 1B with Pena not there to save him.
  15. That was a great barehanded play by Walden.
  16. Wrote that about 30 seconds before he came in? Yup, oh well. I forgot Tulo had a leg injury and probably wouldnt run if he got on.
  17. [expletive] awesome. He's not even a big base stealer. I love.
  18. Castro is in the game as a pinch runner. Good news is that he's surely gonna get an AB.
  19. C, 1B, LF, and CF have been replaced for the NL so far. Given that the NL has only 2 healthy SSs on the roster, I'd expect Starlin to come in for the 6th or 7th.
  20. I didn't see a thread for the ASG so here goes. Starlin looked spiffy whilst getting introduced.
  21. The funny thing is, that was only the Cubs reserves (and an injured Soriano). Fukudome and Soto (and Lou) were not in the picture.
  22. Yeah he definitely earned himself an opening night roster spot unless he just completely sucks in training camp/preseason.
  23. Same. Except even in their money situation, I don't think the Rays even consider that offer seriously. Maybe Starlin, Cashner, Brett Jackson, interesting lower regarded prospect for Longoria and Price. Even then I have a hard time saying no to that.
  24. Yeah that's what's silly about this. The best players aren't really deciding this. There are 84 "All Stars" this year and people that are around the 70-84 range are going to be the ones playing in the late innings, deciding who gets HFA. So when Hunter Pence of the 30-62 Astros gets a GW single off of Gio Gonzalez of the 39-53 Astros, the Phillies can breathe easy knowing that Game 1 of the World Series would be at Citizens Bank Park.
  25. The Cubs are typically among the more aggressive teams in promoting their players, as well. That also plays into those results. Well lets look at the "home grown" players on the 40 man Cubs roster. (aka players who spent at least a season or two of time in the Cubs minor league system) Soto - Above average discipline Barney - Below average discipline Castro - Below average discipline Campana - meh, slightly below average based on minor league numbers Colvin - Below average discipline LeMahieu - slightly below average based on minors Montaniez - average discipline I think its pretty hard to deny that the Cubs system doesn't produce a lot of patient hitters, but as to why this is the case, there are probably a lot of reasons.
×
×
  • Create New...