we're a better job than wisconsin or michigan. the team isn't exactly in a better place than either of those programs. but the potential for success is much greater. however true the idea that coaches are scared away by chicago hoops, if you forge an alliance with the cpl coaches, the sky is the limit. also, kruger didn't recruit chicago at all and was successful at illinois. the illinois job is the equal of osu and msu, it's a 3-team battle for second, which the other two teams are winning right now and over the last 6-7 years. that can change very quickly and likely would have changed immediately if we were getting one of our top choices. wisconsin doesn't recruit well-enough and thusly limits themselves, their ceiling is low and floor is high. michigan has detroit and ohio to recruit but must share that ground with 2 superior programs. they are also a football school and basketball will always be second. I agree about Michigan and probably Wisconsin. Michigan until this year had the shittiest basketball arena in the Big Ten this side of Northwestern, was getting destroyed by Michigan State and Ohio State for in-state recruits, and like you pointed out is a clear 2nd behind football and always will be, even during the Fab 5 years. If Michigan were to ever reclaim recruiting dominance in Michigan then the story might change. But despite a few footsteps in the right direction, I can't see that ever truly happen with Izzo at the helm. Illinois should be 4th in the Big Ten. Getting in good with the HS coaches is big, but Illinois is the big in state school and I just don't see many of them referring their kids to DePaul, Bradley or Southern Illinois over Illinois (in terms of in state options) regardless of who is coaching.