Jump to content
North Side Baseball

JudasIscariotTheBird

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,340
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by JudasIscariotTheBird

  1. I'd agree, apart from a playoff bestball lineup I have that is set up to do some real damage. I got three entries into the finals of a contest on Underdog. Only one of them has a shot at first (150k), and it's going to be uber-chalk...apart from having MVS and Jauan Jennings. I'll give more details when they release all the lineups that advanced later this week. Then I'll have a better idea of what my chances are. But a Mahomes/CMC/Pachecco/Kelce/Rice/MVS/Jennings lineup (where only 1 QB, 1RB, 2 WR/TE and 1 Flex count) covers a LOT of squares. Because of the way the contest was structured and the ADP was, large SF stacks were very difficult to draft and then advance from the first week (since they didn't play/score points).
  2. Nope. You have to have the descipline to wait until this happens 10 times. THEN you bet the house. Gambling 101.
  3. Funny. Aren't you the guy that challenged me to a 1k gamble-off and then ghosted/changed his name when I accepted? Are you going to challenge me to a fight next? What's your new login going to be?
  4. I'm glad you feel this way. Not that I really needed assurance, but now I'm certain that trying to score a TD is the right way to play football
  5. A lot of it is Love signaling to the WRs that the defense is likely to be in man or zone, and run a route combo accordingly. Around the goalline they are running a lot of rubs/picks, but in the open field, it's a lot of clearance routes and TE leaks. It isn't anything magic, but defenses are just completely falling apart.
  6. Hard to believe they could play that much better and still lose that game.
  7. And that was only the second funniest thing in football media this week:
  8. Amazing take, given that the Cowboys were the 2 seed.
  9. Greg Olson is really good.
  10. After 94, 95, and 96, the Cowboys cemented themselves as my least favorite football team. Hard for me to imagine anyone can surpass them, for me.
  11. Holy horsefeathers.
  12. horsefeathers these online bookies. https://www.espn.com/espn/betting/story/_/id/39274104/a-13-minute-error-erosion-bettor-bookie-relationship
  13. He's not as accurate as almost all of the other youngish QBs whom I think that about. It's because he can run better than literally every QB in football. Duh. If you respond to a conversion (that you weren't even a part of) where I compare one QB's accuracy to another's, and you say that he has more accuracy issues than I realize, I'm obviously going to think that's what you're addressing. That's how conversation works. I have to imagine you're being disengenuous when you back track to my general favorable impression of Fields from 5 pages ago, and seem to imagine, whole cloth, that I think Fields is some kind of sharp shooter or something. This is troll behavior.
  14. Status? I'm trying to understand why you think me stating that Fields is more accurate than the least accurate first round pick in recent history makes it follow that Fields has more accuracy issues than I know about, but you refuse to converse like a human being.
  15. I'm glad I chose the word pathetic earlier.
  16. Was a responce to: You're so commited to the bit you can't even bother to be coherent? Get a grip, dude.
  17. Lol, and you pretend to not be a troll. Pathetic.
  18. Lol, so you're claiming Trey Lance is more accurate than Fields? When are we going to play chess? Your evaluation is garbage.
×
×
  • Create New...