Jump to content
North Side Baseball

JudasIscariotTheBird

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,312

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by JudasIscariotTheBird

  1. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Well, the game isn't over, so at the moment, the chance that the Pack makes the SB is INFINITELY better than that of the Bears. It’s just that we’ve seen actual good GB teams and this one doesn’t match up to those, really in any way except Rodgers. They scrapped by with a lot of riff raff which is cool, but this game was what they really were when matched up against quality. I’ll admit some jealousy because the Bears NEVER turn horsefeathers to gold like GB, but I’ve watched enough football and so have you. This wasn’t a good team. That’s not an insult, just being real. This was about a 10-6/11-5 team. It was Rodgers and an ok OL and an above average defence, and nothing more. I think they'll be just as good next year. If they strike gold with a WR draft pick and some other complimentary D piece, I think they are better next year.
  2. JudasIscariotTheBird
    This probably reduces their average playoff record to 1-1.13!!! FRAUDS!!! Think it reduces their 2019 Super Bowl appearances to that of 2019 Bears - 0. Well, the game isn't over, so at the moment, the chance that the Pack makes the SB is INFINITELY better than that of the Bears.
  3. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Even that random ass website had their average outcome as 9.7 wins (which, if you aren't good at math, is closer to a 10 wins team). They had a lot of games where they took the lead early and sat on their wins by milking out the clock...and they got sh1t kicked by the 49ers and somehow the Chargers. Ok. Sure, 8-8 it is. Whatever. "Frauds" whatever that means. 8, 9, 10. I don’t give a horsefeathers, this team just wasn’t that good. If you’re good at math 9.7 is closer to 8 than 13. They are and were frauds and 13 wins wasn’t indicative of their true talent level. A perfectly solid season, they achieved more than most probably expected and thought. Just don’t think they were particularly good. If you looked at any ol team through history that actually reached 13 wins, and then looked at the number of teams that were "expected" to win 13 or more games based off of point differentials, you'd probably reduce your list of teams by a good 70%. The Packers were a pretty good team this year. Edit: For instnace: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nor/2019.htm https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/sfo/2019.htm
  4. JudasIscariotTheBird
    What does 34-7 (nee 14) have to do with 10-7 and 21-13? Sweep?! I mean come on, join reality with me. nee 13 This probably reduces their average playoff record to 1-1.13!!! FRAUDS!!!
  5. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Yes, that is indeed their pro football reference page. Well spotted. 34 - 7 What does 34-7 (nee 13) have to do with 10-7 and 21-13? Sweep?! I mean come on, join reality with me.
  6. JudasIscariotTheBird
    I’m not a Bears fan or fan of any NFL team. The Packers were frauds, this happens every year with a few teams over performing. Their true talent was definitely more of a 8 or 9 win team or so, they just weren’t very good. Certainly not 13 win good to me. Even that random ass website had their average outcome as 9.7 wins (which, if you aren't good at math, is closer to a 10 wins team). They had a lot of games where they took the lead early and sat on their wins by milking out the clock...and they got sh1t kicked by the 49ers and somehow the Chargers. Ok. Sure, 8-8 it is. Whatever. "Frauds" whatever that means.
  7. JudasIscariotTheBird
    So? horsefeathers GB
  8. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Yall are salty merely because the Packers are not the Bears. 13-3 is most assuredly the upper end of what they could have done, but they were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC and it isn't really debatable. Claiming they should have been an 8-8 team is just trolling powered by extreme salt.
  9. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Yes, that is indeed their pro football reference page. Well spotted.
  10. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Deserving to be here or not, it’s not surprising their exit involved getting blown out. They were frauds all year and easily could’ve been like 8-8. They just aren’t good and lucked in to 13 wins. Your Mom could have been 8-8, but you don't see me bringing up her point differential. Seriously though, the Packers were clearly the 3rd best team in the NFC. I'm not surprised they are getting stomped by the 49ers, but the reason they went 13-3 is that they were better than most of the teams they played. 8-8 is stright non-sense and some kind of 1% low end of possible outcomes.
  11. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Btw, all of this "Packers don't deserve to be here" stuff is silly. Apart from the Saints (who got housed by the horsefeathering Vikes) no one else has a claim to play the 49ers in this game.
  12. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Welp, now I can look forward to the baseball season getting under way
  13. JudasIscariotTheBird
    I've got a Costco order for a sweet deal on a 65 inch M-Series Vizio and sound bar...IF the Packers somehow win this and I host a Super Bowl thing with the extended family. Daddy needs a new pair of HDR shoes! Let's go Pack!
  14. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Well, its true that Almora is just a guy and that could maybe work as a 5th OF, but that means almost nothing. He'll probably be a better guy than he was last year (because its almost impossible to be worse) but Almora sucks and we can do better. Bonus coverage: Almora doesn't fit with our team because he can't hit LHP and his defence/non-existant baserunning isn't good enough to make up for it, even as a bench guy.
  15. JudasIscariotTheBird
  16. JudasIscariotTheBird
    I know its just a token endorsement, but I was mildly surprised to see the Bolden commercial on TV, let alone with an NFL logo attached to it at the end. It didn't pull punches.
  17. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Taking advantage of HGH exceptions for getting shot in the guts is the new market inefficiency.
  18. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Wouldn't his ability to play baseball trump his interest or mindset?
  19. JudasIscariotTheBird
    what is a bane? It is the FBI in relation to Happ's WNBA fanaticism.
  20. JudasIscariotTheBird
    I'm just going to assume everyone realized that the gif was a take on the guy's name being Bain...which is a homophone for Bane. ...and he's big. Joke: explained.
  21. JudasIscariotTheBird
    Well, I think that is obvious, but I also think he was talking about Ian Happ.
  22. JudasIscariotTheBird
  23. JudasIscariotTheBird
  24. JudasIscariotTheBird
    This. Give me percentiles or confidence intervals, or you are just waving your arms around like a lunatic.
  25. JudasIscariotTheBird
    If anyone cares to see an absolutely exhaustive breakdown about why the Packers D is simultaniously good and abysmal, and why they are going to get smashed again if they don't make adjustments: [bbvideo=560,315] [/bbvideo]
×
×
  • Create New...