Are you mixing and matching those guys with others on a multi-entry tournament? Because a core of those guys should leave you a lot of money. I'm not a very good DFS player, but I do know that leaving money on the table is typically a good thing in tournaments. But this seems like a tournament where you should probably spend all of your money or as close to it as possible? Yeah, I'm doing a lot of line ups this year. The Mrs's asked me, "Why don't you win a bunch of money again?" when she heard the Masters was coming up (my single entry was runner-up for the milli-maker in that weird fall Masters) and since DK was offering a free 100 dollar entry with 1K in spend, I decided to take her up on her idea. As far as leaving money on the table...it really depends on what the preformance and ownership projections look like, and what kind of tournament you are playing. I'm only playing the millimaker, for which, getting duplicated is a huge bummer. For golf tournaments, in general, as long as you aren't eating all the chalk, you can be ok. But for the Masters there are much fewer golfers (and more dinosaurs that you can't really play) so duplicates in really large tourments like the millimaker become a concern. So for the Masters, you need to be more ownership-conscious, AND more apt to leave money on the table. For instance, the lineup I won all the cash with left 200 on the table, but two of my golfers wound up being much more chalky than I had guessed, and I was duped, thankfully only once. I'm leaving at least 100 on the table for all of my lineups, unless it has someone that I think is going to be super low-owned, or has 3+ players around 5% owned...and then I have some special sauce I'm not going to mention here. Oh, and 0% Tiger.