Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Wilson A2000

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,310
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Wilson A2000

  1. Boozer looks like he will play and start Wednesday. He went through a full practice and feels good. It is Boozer's ultimate decision on whether or not to play though. http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2010/11/boozer-practices-bulls-debut-wednesday-possible.html
  2. And your reasons are bad. Put Brady, Manning, and the other guys I mentioned in this offense and the team is better. I don't think I said he needs to be replaced. I said lately (since the bye) Cutler was the weak link because he was the weak link. The line was playing better, the running backs were playing better, the receivers were getting separation, and the defense was solid while Jay was throwing more picks in the red zone. Jay obviously isn't bad anymore. I did not forecast that Cutler would be the weak link forever, but if the Bears want to be a serious contender he had to up his play. And he certainly did and I am ecstatic. This is the Cutler that the Bears thought they were getting.
  3. And he's a poor talent evaluator, takes too long to adjust when his personnel stinks (Tommie Harris), bad at challenges, forced out good coaches (Rivera) and so on and so on. lovie is a pretty good evaluator of talent as it relates to his scheme. Mark Anderson and Tommie Harris were both terrible and Lovie refused to take them out of the lineup until it was obvious to everyone that they couldn't play anymore. Manning was his personal project and not until this year has he showed anything. But he really hurt the team last year.
  4. Because I originally said that Sanchez was maybe (meaning not certainly) as good as Cutler. Why would you write an insanely long post when all you had to do was recognize that I said maybe? Everyone looked ahead to the part where I said in jest that that he was basically the same guy because Sanchez has a much better line and receiving core. I tried to defend the "maybe" by pointing out that Jay and Sanchez had very similar stats going into today. Everyone here (including me) gets their jollies by pointing out where others are wrong. But why completely overlook what I originally said where I poked fun at myself by saying they were basically the same. I did that because you guys missed something do obvious where I qualified my statement. But all I said was that maybe Sanchez is not too far behind because they have similar stats. The point is that there are 5-6 QBs in this league who can do exactly what Jay does in this offense even with a bad line and an average receiving core at best. Jay has his best game this year and all of the sudden no one else can do what Jay does.
  5. there is no maybe in that statement. oh, and you are insufferable. That was a joke buddy and I am pretty sure you knew it. For some reason you get incredibly ignorant when you argue with me. I originally said maybe and was trying to make light of the fact that everyone jumped all over it. that's really weird dude I know. I thought you would look at what I originally said and wise enough to read when someone is self-deprecating.
  6. Since you didn't refer to anything specifically you are probably talking about your incessant complaining of the Bears' defense after the opposition marches down the field only to wind up with a FG all the while the Bear defense is ranked third and fifth in points and yards respectively.
  7. No he won't. With his line and his receivers Mark will be. Jay has more talent than Sanchez. Sanchez will be the better QB.
  8. there is no maybe in that statement. oh, and you are insufferable. That was a joke buddy and I am pretty sure you knew it. For some reason you get incredibly ignorant when you argue with me. I originally said maybe and was trying to make light of the fact that everyone jumped all over it.
  9. And he's a poor talent evaluator, takes too long to adjust when his personnel stinks (Tommie Harris), bad at challenges, forced out good coaches (Rivera) and so on and so on.
  10. you said that mark sanchez is basically jay cutler, then you backpedaled. as your penance, never compare mark sanchez to jay cutler again. I never said Sanchez is basically Jay Cutler right now. Maybe is not basically. But give Sanchez two more years and he will be a better QB than Cutler. Sanchez is young enough where you can put up with his turnovers, but it looks like Jay has yet to learn.
  11. Everyone's hurt.
  12. Before today their stats were quite similar. but they shouldn't be similar if they are the same quarterback. you said sanchez has a much better line and receivers. shouldn't sanchez have much better numbers then? Yep. That is why I said maybe. what a bold statement, then. It wasn't meant to be bold until you jumped all over it.
  13. LeBron bumped Spoelstra on his way to the bench last night just like he did to Mike Brown. There is no way Spoelstra survives this unless the Heat have an incredible December. I knew Spoelstra was out of his league when Bosh said in an interview that the team wants to practice so hard and Spoelstra wants them to practice so hard and they decided to meet in the middle. Barkley totally ripped Bosh saying that Bosh has never won and has no idea how hard you have to work to win in practice. LeBron and Bosh just don't respect Spoelstra. Riley isn't far behind. http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ball_dont_lie/post/Video-LeBron-James-bumps-his-coach-again?urn=nba-289728
  14. Before today their stats were quite similar. but they shouldn't be similar if they are the same quarterback. you said sanchez has a much better line and receivers. shouldn't sanchez have much better numbers then? Yep. That is why I said maybe.
  15. Before today their stats were quite similar.
  16. Or, in truth, he's the exact opposite of Jay Cutler in every way imaginable. So Jay doesn't lead game winning last minute drives like he did last week? I said MAYBE Sanchez was on his level. But MAYBE NOT. he led a game winning drive and so did jay? they must be twins! They are both little punks. Must be separated at birth.
  17. Or, in truth, he's the exact opposite of Jay Cutler in every way imaginable. So Jay doesn't lead game winning last minute drives like he did last week? I said MAYBE Sanchez was on his level. But MAYBE NOT.
  18. Did they show that on tv somewhere? It was on the postgame on Fox.
  19. be honest... how many bulls games have you actually watched this season? 2? 3? rose's defense is definitely passable rose is closing in on deron and cp3 quickly. i think one year from now, he'll either be tied with them or pass them. let's not forget about the age difference here. paul and deron have pretty much plateaued. rose keeps getting better and hasn't reached his ceiling yet. i can't wait to see what numbers he puts up when boozer comes back (for 6 weeks) Yep. Rose is definitely not a bad defender. Middle of the pack and probably rising. The only glaring weakness is Rose's game was the three, which the other two you mentioned have. And this year it is at least an option. He could also probably do a little better job of dishing out to another player when he breaks down the defense. I know he doesn't have a ton to work with due to Boozer being out, but it seems that Rose is only looking to score when he beats his man. The big guys begin to converge on him and someone has to be open.
  20. He's basically Jay Cutler with far far better receivers and a line.
  21. Do you consider Ken Whisenhunt, Bill Callahan, Tom Coughlin, Andy Reid, Mike Martz and Lovie Smith to be fantastic coaches, then? Sorry I meant Super Bowl winning ones.
  22. That's why he's just blah. Super Bowl teams have fantastic coaches. I want a fantastic coach.
  23. I guess someone fell from the stadium onto the street and died at the game today. Can you call over the top of Soldier Field?
  24. his team loves him and he's managed a bunch of former head coaches without drama. lovie is what he is: a fairly successful system head coach that players believe in and will go to war for. i don't see how you can ask for much than that. A high school coach, yes. Not an NFL coach in a huge market with a storied franchise. Fine Lovie brings with him his system and the fact that players play hard for him. That makes his just an average coach which is what I have been arguing all along.
  25. Wilf sure made it seem like Frazier is getting the job for good next year when he gave him the game ball and said he hoped this would be one of many wins for him.
×
×
  • Create New...