To the K-rate: Meh. The three seasons we're talking about are at age 20, 21, and 22. His first year was a really strong rookie year (3rd in ROY voting) that ended with him taking the mound in the biggest game of the season and playing up to the moment (6 innings with some K's, really impressive game IIRC, Tigers v Twins in Minn). Call me a sucker for pedigree, but I think it's a well known fact that guys who come into this league and make an impact at a really young age are most likely to end up your studs. Porcello's gone through no major injury issues through his first three seasons, they haven't really babied him by today's standards as he's throw 170, 162, and 182 during those three seasons, and he's not not picking up K's because his stuff sucks. I think guys like Lee, Wilson, Halladay, and even our own Shark are showing that pitchers can age like a fine wine if they really stick to their craft and avoid devastating injury. If Turner's K rate or stuff was THAT much better, sure. If his pedigree even matched Porcello's, maybe. If I liked how he threw the ball as much then I'd be right with you. If he had all or a couple of those things, then I'd be right with you even with this probably minor injury. Honestly Turner's biggest advantage is service time, which is a pretty sweet advantage even if the Cubs are going to be fine with money. Plus, I think Shelby Miller is the only guy from that '09 first round HS pitching crop that is going to live up to the hype. Edit: Will say that Turner's more comfortable with his breaking stuff.