I think the fact that prospect discussion has blown up on the internet over the past decade makes prospects overrated in the fan world. Some of the things I heard post-Garza trade (Chris Archer can be better than Garza - theoretically true since it's not impossible and he's done nothing at the ML level to prove otherwise - was infuriating on many levels) left me a little wtf? when it came to prospects. Iunno prospects are a very touchy subject....you NEED alot of them but you need alot of them because 75% of them (at least) will bust. You really have to analyze everything about them including the climate of the minor league world in general...for instance recent graduation of an absolute crapton of young studs into the MLB over the past say...5-6 years....has left the minors relatively weak over the past few seasons, allowing for very high rankings (at least IMO) for guys like Chris Archer (who has walked less than 5 per inning once so far, when repeating a level) or young relatively unknown tools guys. Could be that it was always this way and I'm being selective, but it's definitely how I've felt in recent years. Maybe this was helped by the sort of changing of the guard that's happened in the big leagues....the stars of the 90's/00's being on the way out as the next generation of guys (Verlander, Cabrera, etc) have become the prime veterans while even more young guys (Justin Upton, Stanton, Felix etc) work their way up the ML star ladder. I'm not articulating it very well but it's not something I've given a ton of thought too...Maybe I should, because it IS more interesting than not IMO...and I know I'm not the only one who's called the past maybe 3 years in the minors kind of a lull. It'd have to be some kind of quantitative history article that I don't even have much of a thesis for anyway....Mucho work would have to be done.