All of that is easy to say now that Starlin is struggling and Trout has a BABIP over .400. I would've been one of those who would've thought about taking Starlin over Trout. Right now, I wouldn't, though I still think Castro puts up some nasty numbers in his prime at a more premium position. A few months ago, Starlin was playing awesome D (still is), hitting for avg, and showing an improvement in power (still is), but the only thing he wasn't doing was walking. Meanwhile, in an extremely small sample and at the age of 19, Trout struggled in the major leagues in 2011. While that didn't mean much because of age and sample, that still was all we had to judge him in the MLB, so Starlin was much safer. So, while very few would do it now, it was far from crazy to take him over Trout a few months ago.