Jump to content
North Side Baseball

SouthSideRyan

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48,499

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by SouthSideRyan

  1. SouthSideRyan
    Brock broke it first
  2. SouthSideRyan
    Not according to Tree's sister..... Literally the only reason I included that last sentence was for the easy setup.
  3. SouthSideRyan
    shut up I really do, the Arkansas State guys I know are really bummed about losing him. Who the hell has "Arkansas State guys"? Work contacts in Jonesboro and Brinkley. I'm very big down there.
  4. SouthSideRyan
    With what?
  5. SouthSideRyan
    What happened to his defense last year? Unless he's breaking down physically, I'd have to imagine he'll have a bounce back year next year.
  6. SouthSideRyan
    shut up I really do, the Arkansas State guys I know are really bummed about losing him.
  7. SouthSideRyan
    Every 3 years I believe? I think it's a rotation of eras.
  8. SouthSideRyan
    Even soccer10 realizes the only chance his Raiders have is from a Tebow injury.
  9. SouthSideRyan
    Is anyone saying take Headley's road #s and that's his expected level of performance? You're acting like he has a 371 BABIP in all games. Regression works both ways.
  10. SouthSideRyan
    You are.
  11. SouthSideRyan
    I have to imagine his LD% was higher.
  12. SouthSideRyan
    He should still be tarred and feathered for voting for Maury Wills over him.
  13. SouthSideRyan
    Actual BABIP: .339 small math error on dave's part, too. the road expected babip number using his formula is .338. No, it's not.
  14. SouthSideRyan
    Were you adjusting based on your flawed concepts of "normal BABIP" and the ability of a park to affect BABIP?
  15. SouthSideRyan
    At least if the Bears season continues to go down in a fiery fireball of fire, it will be for the benefit of Timmy.
  16. SouthSideRyan
    Besides his previous performance over a decent sized sample.
  17. SouthSideRyan
    I'd take numbers not existing just so I didn't have to hear about how a guy is a certain # starter rather than a different # starter. You got to nd base? Loser, I got to rd base with her last week! You're right. This is better. Like I'd ever let her stop me at nd base.
  18. SouthSideRyan
    Fine. Average. Who cares what average BABIP is? He's not a pitcher.
  19. SouthSideRyan
    I had the exact same thought. So did jaydee.
  20. SouthSideRyan
    There is no "normal" BABIP for hitters.
  21. SouthSideRyan
    Wouldn't an overall average BABIP in an extreme pitchers park be a very good thing? No. There's nothing intrinsic about PetCo that makes it harder to get a hit on a bap. uhhhhhh fly balls? http://www.twinkietown.com/2010/5/11/1467191/another-way-of-looking-at-babip Foul territory as well.
  22. SouthSideRyan
    Not for a guy with decent speed and a career LD% of 19.4
  23. SouthSideRyan
    On a .374 BABIP. Do you expect he'll be able to sustain that going forward? He has a .339 career BABIP in over 2100 plate appearances. pre or post-tinkering?
  24. SouthSideRyan
    All I had to do was look at his career numbers and see that he's never put up an OPS that low in a season with more than 21 PAs.
  25. SouthSideRyan
    Keep tinkering.
×
×
  • Create New...