I'm in the don't trade him unless someone is willing to make a ridiculous, top prospect filled offer. Luckily, that's the same camp that Epstein and Hoyer are in. I'm in the "leverage this asset as fully as possible" camp. If management doesn't foresee us being competitive until 2014 or later, I'd prefer to find a trading partner sooner rather than later. If having him for 2012 just means we'll lose 90 games instead of 95 (or whatever), there's really no reason not to at least explore trade possibilities. It's really just a more pronounced version of the Marshall trade; if you're not in a position to fully utilize an asset, you find a way to get something in return that you will be ready when you are. Having Garza in 2012 is an asset for 2014.