I'm not so sure he doesn't understand all this. I just think it's not on him to give a crap about the long-term interests of the ballclub. He's on the Chicago Cubs in 2013 and they suck and just traded away a good player. He saw this last year and he's been a part of a team that has been bad for a long time. At 30,000 feet you can see the promise on the horizon, but the guys who have to play on this crap team right now don't have the advantage of tuning out and waiting for the future. i guess i just don't really see the difference. this team was already bad with feldman. there was no realistic scenario in which the cubs became good in the second half and made the playoffs. they can win like 68 games with feldman and clevenger and other assorted great guys who play the game hard and play the right way, or they can win 62 games with other great guys who sometimes play the game the wrong way. and i'm sure it sucks being on a lousy ballclub, but when you sign with a team that hasn't won it all since the teddy roosevelt administration, you should have an idea of what you're getting into. So your argument is that Samardzija was stupid to sign a huge contract when he was drafted because the Cubs were going to slash payroll and not try 6 years down the road? It's not out of the realm of possibility that he is NOT signing with the team (long-term) because they haven't won it all since the Roosevelt administration, and with every sell off and punt of a season, it doesn't look like it'll change. (from his perspective) How you could have been a college athlete and not see the difference from a player's perspective on winning 62 games vs 68 games (with guys they like) is astounding. Jeff Samardzija doesn't (and shouldn't) give a [expletive] about what's going on in A ball and how everything is going to be saved by 2016.