One problem with this point of view. They traded those guys for Josh Beckett in 2005 (along with Harvey Garcia and Jesus Delgado), the year after they won the World Series. In 2004, Ramirez mostly split time between A+ and AA and had zero chance of being called up to the team in 2004. Anibal Sanchez pitched 76 innings in short season ball in 2004. There was even less of a chance to see him get called up to the majors that season than Ramirez. Shh.............don't blow holes in arguement. How dare ya? :D My point is this, for yrs, the Red Sox made deals that were considered risky, and desparate. Picking up pre MVP candidate David Ortiz. Letting Mo Vaughn and Roger Clemens leave. Looking back, it was great decisions to let them leave, but 20/20 at the time, it was considered risky, and they took heat. That's where the Cubs are....at the "risky and desparate" stage. I don't want them to trade Pie, but if they are not going to play him, let him go. In what universe was letting Clemense leave after '96 a good move? Picking up David Ortiz for 2M was a risky move in the same way the Cubs picking up Dempster on his injury rehab was a risky move. None of those examples have anything to do with Pie. Letting some free agents leave because they thought they were entering their decline phase? Signing a low risk high reward contract? How are these examples of a team that desperately wants a world series?