they were 16 games over .500 in one-run games too? you're being intentionally dense. if you have a team with a good run differential and good execution of fundamental play, you probably have a WS contender. i can't believe this is so controversial, but the groupthink evident in this thread is that the 2nd aspect is simply BS. it's really a bizarre bias. I'm being intentionally dense???? The '03 Tigers were one of the worst teams EVER. Yet they managed to perform above 500 in 1 run games. 19-18 in 1 run games. 24-101 in non 1-run games. You don't see what I'm getting at here? You have one of the worst teams in baseball history, yet according to your definition of what wins 1 run games, they were a fundamentally sound worst team in baseball. Imagine how many losses they'd have if they weren't fundamentally sound? They may have only won single digit games!