Jump to content
North Side Baseball

SouthSideRyan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,510
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by SouthSideRyan

  1. You think if OSU goes undefeated in the Big Ten with a noncon win over USC that they wouldn't belong in the title game?
  2. I think his point about having the long layoff before bowl season is valid. I also agree that the Big Ten is not as good as they think they are, and that in general, their clinging to tradition hampers their ability to keep up with the Joneses And that's fine, if that's all they're interested in, they can play a schedules like the PAC 10 going into the first week of December. The conference title game is a cash grab. Missouri's the only team listed in that article that would make the slightest bit of sense. The conference title game is the only "benefit" to adding a team. Adding multiple teams would be crazy, and will never happen.
  3. That article(like most regarding Big Ten expansion) is pretty much garbage. Ooooh, let's add Rutgers, Syracuse, and Iowa St. That way we can have an unwieldly conference with 3 new terrible teams. Yeah telling Notre Dame that Purdue, MSU, and UM won't play them anymore certainly will force them to lose money by joining the Big Ten. Notre Dame does usually have a hard time finding opponents so this makes sense.
  4. The issue was/is they could've have cleared up money for Bradley in other ways. Non-tendering Gaudin/not signing the utterly contemptible Aaron Miles brings to you within ~1.5M. Failing that, the combo of no Kevin Gregg and Aaron Miles would have actually cost less than keeping DeRosa + Wuertz. It was typical focus on what a guy doesn't do by Hendry, and as usual he kept that tunnel vision going all offseason.
  5. They should use (bullpen ERA*2.5) It's shorthand.
  6. What? That was an easy catch for Theriot. He didn't stretch at all. He whiffed, it was entirely his fault.
  7. I've been trying to find a way to get the word "murdered" inserted below there for the better part of the last 2 hours. Why not just put "bandwagoner" in the sig? Try and keep up.
  8. Is this sig the compromise that's miserable for all parties?
  9. I've been trying to find a way to get the word "murdered" inserted below there for the better part of the last 2 hours.
  10. The limit on sig characters is really killing me. I had a nice Pitino inspired "Michael Jordan isn't walking through that door" rant from Vinny but it was way over. Celtics: 108 Bulls: 92
  11. The public demands Stacey King's insight.
  12. Blood = flagrant. Except at the end of game 5, of course. Or the middle of game 6.
  13. I'm not here to talk about the past. The past being years 1989-2001
  14. I want to see his ugliness broken down numerically.
  15. http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/7b/fullj.1dc4b4656012a497e1a1c9b6c669d998/1dc4b4656012a497e1a1c9b6c669d998-getty-86012980jg007_bulls_celtics.jpg http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/436/poorkg1.jpg http://www.derok.net/images/sports/kevin%20garnett%20championship.jpg And you all supported it!! ALL OF YOU!!!
  16. Rose timed it perfectly, and Rondo didn't get much of a jump. It was a poorly designed play(Vinny-esque) by the Celtics, and a great defensive play by Rose.
  17. The Bulls don't play defense?
  18. Bill James also considers Allen the exception to the rule regarding clubhouse chemistry, that Allen's miserable [expletive]-titude actually made his teammates worse.
  19. There's a pretty fine line between an intentional trip, and a late getting to the spot trip. I put it on the same level as whoever busted up Pierce last night. It only got attention becasue Hinrich was cut open.
  20. I really don't think Hinrich tripping over Rondo can be placed in the same category as the foul on Miller which I really don't think can be placed in the same category as the Hinrich toss. Hinrich tripped over Rondo's foot, I don't think there's any way to prove any sort of intent there. then Rondo went to foul a guy going for a layup to prevent him from scoring, and winds up smacking him in the face then Rondo gets tangled up with Hinrich, and loses his temper tossing Hinrich into the table. Any one of these on their own is a non-story, the problem is the escalation of events.
×
×
  • Create New...