Yes, and this is why I thought that it was absurd at the time. I'm not sure how anyone can measure something like this. Last year, we saw how inept the offense could be when you put low OBP guys in front of an offensive machine like Lee was. How many runs and/or games did it cost the Cubs to have Patterson, Neifi and Macias getting a ton of at bats in the top two spots last year? If Lee had OBP machines in front of him, I don't think a 150 RBI season would have been out of the question. This time around, it's poor OBP guys and no Lee. That's probably worse than poor OBP guys and Lee. But, how do you truly and accurately measure the impact 1 player missing from a line up? I don't think you can. yep, definitely very difficult to measure, as baseball's such a situational. not only does replacing lee with neifi, hairson or mabry hurt, but walker and ramirez suffer as well. considering the impact on walker and ramirez as well, i'd wager the cubs are losing at least a run per game.