Except Walker gets more extra base hits than Furcal, so he doesn't always have to steal a base to get into scoring position. I'm not sure that kind of money is worth some stolen bases. Also, the Braves don't want him back. If they felt he was that important to their team, I think they'd find a way to keep him around. They usually aren't wrong about these types of things. It's not about if they think he's important or not. It's about whether they think they can compete with their funds allocated elsewhere. Do you think they thought Sheffield was done when they got rid of him? Or JD Drew? They got rid of them because they thought they could maintain their level of success by replacing them for less money and using what was left over to strengthen another need on the team. If they don't re-sign Furcal, it will be because they believe they can go with a cheaper alternative and make up the production elsewhere, not because they feel they don't need him. See bold. Which is exactly what we should do with Ronny Cedeno. We all know what the market is for shortstops, thats why we really need to give a $350K option a shot. 8M in the OF gets you a whole lot more than 8M at shortstop. The braves are smart, they dont need to resign furcal because they have betemit, if we sign furcal with cedeno its just another example of how poorly this organization is run. So why not put Cedeno @ 2b then?? It sounds like he's pretty versatile, and Furcal's > Walker in the long run. Furcal gives the Cubs someone they can pencil into the lineup for the next 4-8 years, who fills a need, leadoff, and plays good d at a key spot, SS. I see no reason to penny pinch when this is big market team, w/ several major needs.