I'm not sure smack talk is the right term for it when one side is throwing out poorly researched, incorrect statements, and the other side is simply correcting them repeatedly. You correcting statements I've said, but there irrelevant to Purdue losing at home....Yeah I might not have done a good job supporting my case and looking up the stats, but you've came up with absolutely no information that actually proves anything against Purdue winning at home except that they lost to one of the best teams in the country and played horrible. You missed the point I stated in one of the earlier long posts...which is that none of the information you posted, however inaccurate, was relevant. Purdue is a slightly better team, and should win on that merit. What they've done in the past 2 years is about as relevant as the repeated beatings they took at home 3 years ago. 3 years ago they didn't have nearly the talent (Hummel, Moore, Johnson, etc.) and Illinois lost in the national championship game. How would those games be as relevant as a game played between the two teams last year when many of the same players that will play tonight also played for their respective teams?