I pretty much gave up console gaming & switched to PC-only after the PS2 got stale, but . . . I'd take the 360 over the Wii. The Wii is making a big splash right now, mainly because of the new interface style, but it's a bit too gimmicky to base an entire console purchase upon. The motion-detection is cool for sports, but for FPS or adventure/RPG gaming its uses are limited. Swinging swords in Zelda is well and good, but do you really want to do that repeatedly across an entire 100-hr Final Fantasy-type grind? Will game developers innovate enough to keep the new Wii interface relevant to the gameplay? Like the DS's second screen, it's a nice thing to have, but many games use it as an enhancement to the game rather than as the primary interaction system. I just can't see the "nunchuck" being universally integrated well across all the game genres, and it seems likely that developers will try to force the feature into games, making the results less than ideal. The potential for it to become downright silly is big, IMO. As an aside, the legacy games ability is cool, but emulators are already out there doing the job. If you're more of a "hardcore" gamer, someone who likes cutting edge graphics, action/FPS games, more mature titles and online gaming, the 360 has the advantage. If you've got an HDTV, it's the no-brainer choice. The 360 also has a year of experience under it's belt, making it a safer buy in terms of build quality and bug-fixes. And if you're putting your money on HD-DVD (unwise move IMO, but hey), then you've got that upgrade option available. That being said, I'd personally ask G'ma to chip in on a PS3 gift card for when the next wave ships. While the initial launch has been pooh-pooh'ed and the game selection was criticized, once Sony works out the kinks and developers learn the ropes of programming the beast, the PS3 will rule the roost.