I think there's a happy medium. Guys like Brennamen and Harrelson have a tendency to excessively whine and complain, almost even bash other teams. There could be a little bit of rose colored glasses here, but Len doesn't really go there. When I think "homer" I think of someone who calls the game based more on a rooting interested than what is actually going on. Of course there should be a slight bias, but not to the extent that some guys call a game. Why not? Their intended audience are fans of the team they work for. Because I want to hear a legitimate broadcast, not a cheer-leading squad. Guys like Harrelson and Brennaman, Harrelson being the absolute extreme can ruin an entire broadcast, even if you are on their side. Hawk and Brennaman are hacks and have plenty of examples of being "cheerleaders," but I'm still baffled as to why you're complaining when that happens when their team wins in walk-off fashion. It would be one thing if you were showing a clip of him calling a Reds home run like that yet they were still down by God knows how many runs and had no chance to win, but come on...complaining that they're being too excited or "homers" over a walk-off win is [expletive] ridiculous. Very true, N&G. I think the hiring of Dusty and Jocketty was an attitude change for the Reds organization. They clearly put a target on the Cardinals and they became 'enemy Number 1'. They were the team to be beat, in every aspect of the game. And the announcers picked up on it. While some complained that Harry Caray was a homer and yes, he was..he still criticized the Cubs when they deserved it. I think the fans want excitement but also want to hear the frustration and sometimes, disgust when they see it on the field. Harry would never say "we" like Hawk always does about the White Sox. Harry would ask "Do you have a mouse in your pocket?". Harry was the best.