All of those are pretty defensible. Brownlie was a Top 10 talent who slipped because of signability. Harvey was a possible #1 pick, while Markakis was thought to be a reach where he was drafted as a hitter (most saw him as a pitcher). Pawalek, again, was a top 10 talent who dropped because of signability. And Vitters was a consensus top 5 talent as well. Hayden Simpson or Tyler Colvin are one thing, but none of these were questionable in terms of overall talent. Development is/was a different story, of course. Defensible, but ultimately wrong. There may or may not have been others with similar opinions about the players the Cubs took, but the fact is they were the ones who took them and they were the ones who missed out. Development is an issue, but you can't dismiss the problems they have had drafting just becasue there are reports that other people thought relatively highly of the guys the Cubs took. If you were really good at drafting, you would do a better job than the Cubs have done. All those guys the Cubs took had equal or greater talent of the players they were drafted over at the time. The guys the Cubs took all had good amateur track records and like most have said were regarded by most of baseball, not just the Cubs, as some of the most talented players in their drafts. I really think player development is most to blame for those guys not turning out as prospects/major league players. I'd place the blame Hendry/FO for not having better coaches/mentors/trainers in the minor league system rather than blaming them for taking the "wrong" guys. It's pretty evident our player development in the minor league system is flawed and needs fixing, especially when it comes to position players.