Soft-tossing middle reliever. As good as he is, the Cubs aren't likely to get enough of a return because he isn't a proven closer to justify trading him. In short you're proposing trading him just for the sake of trading him. If the ideal deal is out there, but again, there's zero reason for the Cubs to be in fire sale mode. As bad as they are they can easily compete again next year, and trading Byrd likely leaves a very large hole in the OF that can't be filled until 2012 since Fukudome will also be gone and potentially you're going to have to deal with a useless Soriano. See Marshall. A useful player, but ultimately too limited (in this case by actually ability, or the lack thereof when it comes to hitting righties, as opposed to lack of a reputation). No reason not to trade him if the right deal is there...but it's very unlikely to be there. Give the Cubs' questions at 2B and potentially at 3B he likely holds much more value on the team than via a low-level trade. Wait, what? I was probably the biggest Barney basher here, but he's turned out to be useful, young and cheap. Why ship him off when he's all of those things and the Cubs have no obvious answer at 2B? A Baker/Barney platoon at 2B next year has the very real shot of being very productive AND cost-effective. You'd be creating another hole in the rotation. Cashner and Wells both have big question marks right now, so subtracting a good pitcher from the rotation without an obvious replacement isn't a good idea. Yes, there's McNutt, but as we've seen this year you don't go shedding your pitching options just because you can. Besides, Dempster's player's option and his price tag likely preclude the Cubs getting a decent return short of them picking up too much of the tab. All of the guys I mentioned are fairly easily replaced with internal options. The one that isn't (Dempster) would free up money to get a great (and younger) replacement through free agency. Baker and Barney = DeWitt, LeMahieu, Flaherty Marshall = Russell and the other lefties in AAA Byrd = Jackson Dempster = CJ Wilson for example I don't want these guys traded just for the sake of trading them, and it should go without saying that if decent offers aren't out there, then you hold. But what we're hearing is that Hendry is making none of these guys available. Who knows if that really is true, but if so, I disagree with the approach. Specifically, I don't want the focus to be on cobbling together a mediocre team that might win a crappy division with a little luck. The focus should be on building a team that can dominate any division (short of the ALE), even if it takes more than a year to accomplish and involves some far-sighted trades that create a mini-youth movement in 2012. Marshall is more than just a lefty specialist/LOOGY. He'd be missed and not easily replaced. He has turned into a solid, almost elite, set up man over the last two seasons. While I agree Byrd shouldn't stand in the way of promoting Jackson, I don't think Jackson will be ready to take over the center field job full time from the start of the season next year and I don't think he capable of putting up a .775-.810 OPS like you know Byrd will.