Narrower fairways around the 315-320+ distance where the bombers hit it and longer rough/more trees/bunkers overall + faster greens seem like something that would make some sense in the middle to even the field a bit with the bombers trying to bully courses but also not something that penalizes shorter guys as much. Because yeah, doing something that penalizes everyone still leaves you with guys like Bryson that would maintain a marginal advantage. The PGA Tour isn’t going to ask the courses that hold their events to narrow the fairways at 320. That seems unfair and the Tour likes their long drivers to do well (Bryson, DJ, Koepka, Finau). Plus Bryson can cover that distance already and he’s getting longer and longer. This week’s US Open had some of the narrowest fairways ever with super thick rough and Bryson and Wolff, the longest hitters on Tour, were at the top of the leaderboard because everyone was missing fairways. If Bryson drives it relatively straight compared to the field, there’s nothing you can do to stop him that won’t hurt everyone else more. Oh I generally agree and prefer they just kinda keep it as is. Just if they’re gonna try and change things I’d prefer doing what I laid out vs doing something that penalizes everyone and a guy like Wolff or Bryson will still maintain and advantage. Wolff and Bryson still struggle plenty. The Memorial played close to similar conditions and DJ, Koepka and Bryson all missed the cut or did poorly, the bombers still can struggle and the shorter guys still do plenty well. Bryson hit close to the fewest amount of fairways for a Open winner this weekend. The game is in a good spot, there’s a ton of young talent and there’s plenty of fluctuation and turnover week to week on the leaderboards. I wouldn’t change much.