That's a bit of a strawman. I don't want to trade him because he's an above-average goalie with an appropriate salary and there's no need to create a hole there when there's plenty of quite tradeable, quite expendable assets in line ahead of him. Did *anybody* say he was elite and should be paid as such? He *is* being paid like an elite goalie. Anyone saying that he earns his salary is implying that he is elite. And largely, they are justifying it by pointing to his great run through part of the playoffs and ignoring the part where he was awful. He is paid like he is an elite goalie NOW. But in two years time, his salary will be very reasonable for an above average goalie. You HAVE to overpay in the begining especially after a Cup win in 2013. And what goalie isnt auful at times? The great Lundquist gave up 6 goals to a Tampa team who potted 1,4,3,1,1,0 goals vs the Hawks. Lets also not forget the Hawks split the Jennings trophy this year. I think people when Crawford gives up 3 or 4 goals in a game they blame him instead of the shotty defense that plagued the Hawks at times during the regular season and earlier in the playoffs