minnesotacubsfan
-
Posts
25,068 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan
-
indeed, and you're a miserable prick, so it's all good. lol that gave me a good laugh
-
dude you're creepy
-
Which is the only reason I can think of that caused the ref not to throw it on the low shot. He was reluctant to flag two roughing the passer's on one drive especially if he saw the INT first. I agree that the first call was weak. I think the non-call was a bigger [expletive] up than the call he made though. well i think a lot of these calls are a joke since you can't hit a quarterback high, low, after he releases the ball, lift him of the ground or put your weight on top of him. i don't really consider the "missed" call on favre a bad one because they shouldn't have called the first one, so it would've been a punt and basically the same outcome. no way is it the same outcome, the missed (AND BLATANT) roughing call would have put the Vikings at the 19. Didn't even bother to try to understand and argue what he is saying, did you? umm...yea I read it. But after the called roughing the passer, AP managed to fumble the ball before they were that comfortably in FG range. not the same outcome.
-
Which is the only reason I can think of that caused the ref not to throw it on the low shot. He was reluctant to flag two roughing the passer's on one drive especially if he saw the INT first. I agree that the first call was weak. I think the non-call was a bigger [expletive] up than the call he made though. well i think a lot of these calls are a joke since you can't hit a quarterback high, low, after he releases the ball, lift him of the ground or put your weight on top of him. i don't really consider the "missed" call on favre a bad one because they shouldn't have called the first one, so it would've been a punt and basically the same outcome. no way is it the same outcome, the missed (AND BLATANT) roughing call would have put the Vikings at the 19.
-
OMC will. what a zinger I thought it was hilarious
-
backed. into. Super Bowl. This may very well be the dumbest retort in the history of this message board (excluding trolls). OMC basically told you why you're wrong and you respond with the same hollow immeasurable BS you've been spewing for 2 pages. none of what OMC wrote does anything to prove that Saints didnt have an incredible amount of luck and help in the playoffs. Before I made the "stats" statement, I was apparently looking at playoff only stats - my bad. But when the NFL appologizes for essentially blowing a major call in a championship game, of which most likely would have changed the game dramatically, there is pleny of "measurable BS" for me to make that claim.
-
I think the potential for clashing has more to do with Martz publicly criticizing Jay earlier. The getting out of Denver story is meaningless to me. Martz did? I missed that, I remember Dungy and I thought Ditka being critical, but I dont remember Martz. But so what, I still dont think that leads to a Harbaugh/Ditka type meltdown between two people who havent even worked together yet ET: besides, didnt Martz also say he graded Cutler the highest he had ever graded a QB out of college? idk, I think its way overblown
-
why? because the Colts lead in almost every statisitical catagory not named "Hurricane" ....and obvioulsy, I mean the drink Yeah, that'd work if it were true. Statistical categories in which the Saints beat the Colts: Strength of Schedule Offensive Yards Per Game Time of Possession Total Touchdowns Points Per Game Margin of Victory Total Points Rushing Touchdowns Rushing Yards Kicking Return Yardage Punt Return Yardage Interceptions Sacks Forced Fumbles Passes Defended Defensive Touchdowns backed. into. Super Bowl.
-
I think the whole "Cutler will clash with MArtz" thing is nonsense. Cutler wanted out of denver, true, but if you just made the Pro-Bowl, and a new coach comes to town and tries to trade you behind your back and then denies it, what would be your response? add to it I dont think Culter and Ron Turner ever publically clashed, and most of Cutler's frustration likely came out of dealing with a very weak QB coach, I'd say Cutler has been rather restrained. I'd destroy several Gatorade tubs if I had to work Turner on a daily basis.
-
I know he's not the sexy choice, but he is a very good OC, and one we could build off of for a while. I just hope he ins't thrust into HC after next year.
-
could it be your Spidy Sense?
-
why? because the Colts lead in almost every statisitical catagory not named "Hurricane" ....and obvioulsy, I mean the drink
-
well, because they are.
-
the Browns have a much better chance of beating the Colts then NO does
-
you all realize that I have never been and never will be a Vikings fan, right? objectively look at this, a team that has the fortune that NO has had in the playoffs to get to the SB doesn't exactly represent the best a Conference has to offer. Its the old saying, its better to be lucky then good.
-
they backed into it. they played an Arizona team from the worse division in the NFL then played a Minnesota team that did everything to loose. Good luck with Manning! Archie must be loving this
-
the Saints cant take credit for Adrian Peterson, and allowed illegal hits will cause any QB to become a bit erratic
-
Don't blame them for the fates of Brett Favre. a 5:1 turnover ratio doesn't scream confidence to me when you still need OT at home to win, Favre or no Favre. the Saints wont get that against a good team.
-
NO had the good fortune of playing a team that decided to sh*t their pants insted of showing up, at home, and they STILL needed OT to win.
-
what are you kiding me? 2 ints (one caused by an illegal hit and should have been called back and given MN the ball on the 19), 6 fumbles (3 of which were lost)??? had NO played a real team and not the bumbling idiots they did, no way they are in it.
-
I could give a rat about Allen or Farve, but I believe the Saints backed their way into the SB. I dont think thats even debatable.
-
If it's going to be Rogers then I would assume there is a deadline to get things done well before the Super Bowl. if they're really desperate enough to hire some guy off the street like rogers, al saunders is available. Mike Martz plz
-
so, the Saints and their cheap shots made it to the SB: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4868880 and now they want to do it again: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4869687 go Colts
-
holy [expletive] this really sucks
-
this, soul. Tice was good when he had talent, so/so when he didn't. he basically plays the music given to him.
