He's always been regarded as one of the best pure prospects in the country, even coming out of high school. He's highly athletic, a true speed threat and always has been. The biggest knock I've heard against Harvin is that he's too much like Hester. I'd prefer a more physical compliment to Hester too, but it would definitely strain defenses more to have to worry about both Hester and Harvin. We'd have two true deep threats. Harvin would immediately mean the Bears become an offense that can stretch the field, without any question. I think we could do worse. He might not even fall to us. biggest dif between Harvin and Hester is this: HArvin has always been a WR, Hester has been everything .... and then a WR Harvin is much more polished, besides we have 2 TE's who can be physical downfield