Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. Bears have already lost their sleeper; Detroit Bears 27 Jags 10
  2. I completely agree that even if they keep Mitch and they end up with a shot at QB 3 or 4 they should look hard at that. It's tempting for me, however, to grad a stud tackle, draft QB later, and wait until next year for another QB look. With the interior O-line looking like a strength, shoring up the tackles would be huge
  3. not in the first. 2nd, 3rd maybe Trask moves like a slug. After watching Foles play, I'm not super keen on a QB who can't make plays off his mark. Granted, he's much more mobile than Foles, but when you move him off his spot you get a guy that looks like Cousins on that 4th down yesterday. He panics and can make mistakes when not allowed to sit in the pocket and find an open guy. I just think you need a near perfect offense around him (OL, receivers) for him to have great success. yea, I hate the idea of drafting him and what I mean is that he is a later round project IMO. But I imagine there are other Kyle Murray/Russel Wilson types out there for the taking who would be more worth the gamble (ie shorter, less attention during college, but more athletic). I just don't know who.
  4. not in the first. 2nd, 3rd maybe
  5. I’m really not in the mood to draft a linebacker. My preferences for the first round would be o-line, QB, WR I generally hate narrowing down on the first round. Just get the best players you can. Obviously positional value plays some role if you're talking QB v ILB, but I can come up with needs anywhere on the roster basically. yea, I'm BPA, but mainly at 3-6 positions; OT, EDGE/DT, WR, QB and DB
  6. That's pretty much where I am. The emergence of the interior OL, Trubisky and Montgomery is objectively a good thing, but it's somehow made the future of the team even less clear. It's cemented the mediocrity hell even harder. I like rooting for Trubisky. I like the idea of sticking with a QB we've drafted. I think he's shown he's better than Foles, and that he's capable of being serviceable if the rest of the offense isn't a tire-fire (and apparently Nagy's playcalling was a problem). But that just makes things even more awkward, because 1) he's still not the Franchise QB we want and 2) He's not under contract and Foles is, and Foles' contract was backloaded to hell. We're already in enough of a cap space crunch as it is without trying to figure out how we're going to make room for Mitchy T. The defense looks old and thin, and we knew going into the season the defense looked old and thin, and it's not gonna get less old and thin next year. We're in a really awkward spot because I don't think we have an gaping holes. There's no wildly sub-replacement units that we can fix and suddenly get way better. It's just a raging sea of mediocrity all across the roster, and not a lot of cap space to fix it. I guess maybe you just run it back, try to have a good draft, and figure out where you are after next year? If you resign Trubisky, you can draft EDGE or WR in the 1st round, depending on who is there. That frees up letting Arob go or trading Mack. If you draft OL, you will likely have to bring Arob back. Or, you simply BPA the pick I guess the point is if Trubisky plays himself into a new contract you have more options than if he flat out sucked and you HAVE to draft QB in the 1st.
  7. horsefeathers, draft a 1st day QB if it makes sense where you are in the draft Yes, bring Foles back because you have to. If you get Mitch/Mariotta on a reasonable deal, Foles ensures you aren't throwing the kid into a fire, but if the pick turns out good he'll outplay Foles and Foles will continue to serve back up to the backup
  8. if the Bears win out, the Cardinals have to win out. If they both lose a game, Cardinals are in Bears are 1 game behind but have the tie breaker
  9. horsefeathers
  10. playing for the fg is a mistake here
  11. the only time they threw was when it was obvious they would. I know Monty is having a day, but comon
  12. that was terrible play calling to begin with, and bad throw to end it
  13. not having Johnson is hurting the D. so frustrtating
  14. I dont like the run run run. how about some pass plays on that drive, especially down inside the 40
  15. my thoughts are this: unless you know you can get someone better, you should resign Mitch. You should also draft one, and keep a pipeline until you have a Rodgers/Mahomes, if you can
  16. Trubisky missed Mooney on that 3rd and 3, he looked open in the flat. Overall tho, pretty solid so far.
  17. he's got 15 pass defenses on the year. I know gooney has his take on Pace, but the man can draft. Just not QB it sucks he's out this Sunday What do you think goony’s take on Pace is, exactly? 1) I thought you were gooney once (or was that Sofa? 2) I read this as you feel he drafts poorly (as well as his FA faux pas): "But I think he's been hamstrung by Pace's roster miscues. I could see Nagy learning from his mistakes and doing better down the road, whereas I think Pace is what he is."
  18. he's got 15 pass defenses on the year. I know gooney has his take on Pace, but the man can draft. Just not QB it sucks he's out this Sunday
  19. Packers will likely have the bye, Saints maybe Rams. So, upset the Saints (which isn't impossible) but get blown out by GB.
  20. Really? I keep seeing all 4 of them going in the top 10-12 of mock drafts Teams that I could definitely see picking a QB that will probably finish ahead of the Bears if they go 8-8: Jets, Jaguars, Panthers, Broncos, Giants, 49ers, Patriots, WFT Teams that could pick QB but less likely: Falcons, Cowboys (if they dont keep Dak), Eagles (if they dont like Hurts), Lions, Vikings, Raiders Teams that definitely won't pick a QB: Bengals, Texans, Chargers, Cardinals well, yes, that's the concern I guess, and has always been the concern since early Nov: there are plenty of bad teams needing to draft QB's and more then a few worse then the Bears. That's all I mean by a "decent" shot at one w/o a trade. If the Bears were to finish 6-10, Jets, Jags, Panthers, 49'rs would all likely still be ahead of them. Cowboys, Eagles, and Falcons as well. I think the Broncos will stick with Lock for at least another season FWIW
  21. I feel like we are past the point where we will get a decent shot at one of the top 4 qbs w/o a trade, so just win baby
  22. you're right, I'm sure the white dudes keeping stats for the mlb tried to downgrade or belittle the stats of the negro league as much as they could It didn't have anything to do with white guys keeping stats. Negro League stats are considered spotty because they are incomplete, not because the stats were belittled by white people. The reason they are incomplete is because often times they didn't want to pay or couldn't afford an official scorekeeper for their games and also because many of their games weren't covered by the Negro press members. If a member of the press did attend the game, they'd keep their own scorecard and then publish it along with their game report. That's mostly where our Negro League stats come from: newspapers. So finding the statistics are the issue, not people belittling them. I know that there could be other factors, but given long running racism in this country I just assume the worse from people. thanks for the explanation
  23. you're right, I'm sure the white dudes keeping stats for the mlb tried to downgrade or belittle the stats of the negro league as much as they could
×
×
  • Create New...