minnesotacubsfan
-
Posts
25,105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan
-
he's a nancy boy soft tosser and he's not kyle hendricks what's there not to get His numbers are goodish so :dontknow: YOU CANT BE A NANCY BOY SOFT TOSSER AND AND NOT BE KYLE HENDRICKS DUH I don't like the idea of replacing Darvish with Davies in the rotation, but overall Davies isn't a complete dumpster fire -
[quote name="Wilson A2000" “"This offseason' date=' I've been experiencing symptoms that have left me feeling drained and lethargic. I am working with doctors so I can better understand my condition. [/quote] well Jon, thats really just called "getting old"
-
they shouldnt Why not? The Packers are playing the best football in the league right now and have always hammered the Bears with Rodgers. sure. but anytime you depend on a team outside of yourself, it can backfire
-
i don't think our system (pre-trade) is really all that bad. does this trade improve it significantly or marginally? bye Yu! I miss you already
-
Sounds like they feel confident that the Packers will take care of the Bears for them. they shouldnt
-
eh, his yards, catches are all down (relatively). The one stat Graham is having a good year is TD's (8). its a small revival
-
Robert Tonyan. In the interest of being fair to him, the Packers have been bringing him along since 2017, after the Lions discarded him. So good for him for hanging around until he got his chance. I just think he's a product of Rodgers just like many others, and will disappear if he leaves GB. Kind of sick of seeing him make big catch after big catch! Product of Rodgers? Hasn't Rodgers historically been unkind to his TEs? Was it Rodgers or McCarthys schemes? And Graham was aging by the time he signed with GB, he just happens to be having a late-career revival with Chicago
-
I'd agree. I guess we'll see if he's really as level headed as Pace staked his career on and takes that kind of contract.
-
hoping for a Rams win is probably the more likely scenario in which the bears get into the playoffs, but it wouldn't be the better scenario. The Bears have to prove their offense is really working. I thought they did that against the Vikings and turn around to see the Saints put up more points against their failing D. Its time for the Bears to beat a team at their apex, or get ready to trade up
-
yup our only hope is to hurt Aaron Rodgers We tried that once, it didn't work Try harder
-
But if Ten comes back tonight, and the Bears manage to upset them next week..... Bears Packers wild card matchup? yup our only hope is to hurt Aaron Rodgers
-
NFL perpetual 2020 regular and postseason non Bears thread
minnesotacubsfan replied to NOLA's topic in Other Sports
The packers get away with so much horsefeathers -
But if Ten comes back tonight, and the Bears manage to upset them next week.....
-
Bears and GB will both be playing for something next week. Hopefully, the offense stays on and the D wakes up
-
I don't think the Bears can afford to back into the playoffs. They have to beat GB. Eh. I mean if they continue to look like a real team on offense, I'd take backing in after a 34-28 loss. But if it's 27-3 right before halftime against GB again, then I won't feel very confident that they won't get completely embarrassed in back-to-back weeks. I'd doubt they win either way, but potential matchups against the Saints and Seahawks don't look super daunting. Brees can't really throw anymore. If Pagano can figure out how to make aggressive play calls this time around, the Saints are a team Foles took to OT. Seattle is tough, but their offense hasn't been great recently. The defense looks like it's coming around, though. With the way the Bears offense is playing, it's more likely to be 42-38 then 34-28. But to hell with all of that, just win.
-
Such as the Rams, losing to the Jets. Kind of unsettling when we’d like their help next week. I don't think the Bears can afford to back into the playoffs. They have to beat GB.
-
Bears have averaged 30 ppg for 4 straight games for the first time since 1965
-
Bears win, bears rout, and I still feel Ho-hum about it Welp, bring on GB
-
uff nichols
-
I shouldn't have faith in this team, but I don't see it. Robinson is out for them. Minshew could give them trouble, but don't see it with Glennon starting. I'll be slightly disappointed if they win by single digits. Sent from my SM-A115AZ using Tapatalk Right? They need to route the Jags for me to feel comfortable going back to Soldier field. Well, as comfortable as I might possible be flying directly into the sun
-
An example of how corporations/companies think. Union Pacific railroad made $300 million one year and $250 million the next year. When they started negotiations with the union, they said that they would have to make cuts because they "lost" $50 million. Starting off in public accounting and we’d have firm wide meetings at the beginning of the fiscal year showing targets of 12% profit growth from the year before. At the end of the year we’d only be at 9%, and that would be used as justification for less than ideal bonus/raise packages. I was a minor partner in a firm that one year cut 7 architects/interior designers because of "fear". At the time, we had closed out a fiscal year with over $780k in the bank, enough to pay everyone's salary for a year w/o any new work coming in (40 person firm). But we were slammed busy; with-in 3 months we had to hire 11 people. But you know, they really were good at getting rid of people. I def learned that from them. And no, I don't work for them anymore
-
I watched the '83,'84,'85 bears on a black and white 13" tv. I was a Steelers fan prior to that, I had blonde hair and so did Bradshaw. Growing up in IL and WP changed my mind. its puzzling when I read posts here about the '90's Bears. you guys missed how good we really could be.
-
This is almost painful. nobody on this board wants Mitch to succeed more than I do. so the idea that he might is ....its scary. But it really would be the best thing for the Bears right now
-
In the end, that far off stare we all took for Killer Happ was really just Straight up Honest Happ. horsefeathers the owners.
-
Newman was the qb I was thinking about above
