Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,056
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. just think if they had been serious about Correa
  2. Seattles finest RIP JC
  3. I feel like it's entirely reasonable to feel like that 1% is missing (2) 0's and the the real likelihood of getting Correa is like 97.9992%. I mean we're Cub fans, and on some level building up to disappointment is like drinking water for us
  4. Now signing DE Muhammad from the Colts I'm not a huge fan of new coach picking off his former players (I think coaches can be guilty of over-rating their players sometimes), but I love that Muhammad is younger-ish. It'll be interesting to see if he can build off of his 6 sacks from last year
  5. I'm not terribly upset about this. I think he was seriously overpaid at 3/40.5 just for who he is, not to mention that signing a pure 3T is somewhat of a luxury for a team that needs so much help on offense. I'd like to see bigger contracts for cut players like JC Tretter, Lael Collins, etc. Comp picks could be coming back if handled carefully, but obviously still target the best players for the scheme. how easy is it to find a decent 3t nowadays? I remember how important Tommie Harris was to that defense, not sure if Ogunjobi was "the guy", but it seems like they are harder to find
  6. I didn't realize UNLV was a tenant, but that (2 fields) would certainly add complexity ETA: LV has swiveling columns,,,,,woo hoo! we better get some of those. Pony up Virginia $$$$$$$$ essentially, because of the seating load they need columns that can move and allow the tray to pas by, but that means other columns have to take up the load (and said other columns also swivel!!!). It is more complicated then Phoenix, but that's why rich people build stadiums (or taxpayers) and we sit and marvel at it all I'm confused as to what exactly holds up the load while the swiveling ones are swiveled. A temporary set of columns? And why can't those just be permanent? (these are somewhat rhetorical questions, please feel free to just respond "engineering magic and crossed fingers") I'm not entirely sure, but I think the entire seating area pivots out of the way for the tray to pass through the building opening. The swivels could be mounted on rollers that allow the columns to roll with the seating section above/ like a table on casters so to speak. Def engineering magic however, back to Dan the Man Campbell, his super intendant threatened to kill my client 2 times. Once we began the legal proceedings to have him removed from eh project, Dan lost his license...magically. I wont go into the details, but essentially his business partner left him (and his partner had the license under which we were working) and POOF no more company. We were lucky to finish the project. If you have ever seen "Casino", the house we were working on was 8 houses down from Lucky's place:
  7. I didn't realize UNLV was a tenant, but that (2 fields) would certainly add complexity ETA: LV has swiveling columns,,,,,woo hoo! we better get some of those. Pony up Virginia $$$$$$$$ essentially, because of the seating load they need columns that can move and allow the tray to pas by, but that means other columns have to take up the load (and said other columns also swivel!!!). It is more complicated then Phoenix, but that's why rich people build stadiums (or taxpayers) and we sit and marvel at it all
  8. according to jersey, these will be used for coca plant cultivation and cocaine production, dome or no dome
  9. I dont know the design well enough to know that is true or why, but sure it could have consequences Where that jumbo tron is where they role the field in. It's a big opening. LV had to really beef up the support to put seats in that area (and maybe it's suspect enhineering). Those aren't the highest value seats, but its something. I guess what I mean is how they make the opening in the wall, ie concrete arch or steel truss or.....etc. there are expensive ways and reasons and not expensive ways and reasons but not being part of the design team, I dont know the decisions that led them to the results in either Phoenix or LV
  10. I dont know the design well enough to know that is true or why, but sure it could have consequences
  11. through an unlikely set of circumstance, I met the structural engineer/contractor who did the seating stations at LV's stadium. My guess is it is over designed due to the fact I had to fire him on a project of my own....because he lost his license 1/2 trough it. He holds several engineering and contracting licenses and the one he lost was not his engineering license that he used for the stadium, but the incompetence remains. Lets hope the Bears design team finds a better option in the Chicago area eta: I guess he thinks engineering is similar to ballroom dancing..yeah guess what its not https://www.reviewjournal.com/local/henderson/engineer-in-step-with-changing-las-vegas-landscape/ Thanks. Maybe the Tottenham approach is possible too. I know Houston used to have a movable field approach but it seemed to really cause injury issue (negating the pro grass point) based on seaming the field pieces together. But that was a ton of seams. If it was just one seam, maybe that would lessen the concerns there. or better yet, 0 seams like Phoenix
  12. no, but summer/spring/fall months it would grow well and still allow the Bears to use the stadium for other purposes, march madness, concerts, what have you, and not destroy the turf doing so. Plus, a grow-house could be constructed next to the stadium if you want to keep it warm but dormant during the winter That's true I guess. Lambeau uses some sort of artificial light growing system for the winter months and they do pretty well. They also have that hybrid grass that's reinforced with turf. If it works for them I'd think it works for Chicago and then you just gotta put the whole field on giant wheels (basically). As far as other venues, this is just my wacky idea with zero professional knowledge. Grass as your base level with optimisized NFL sight lines. An artifical light/irrigation system that rolls out over it but that can also support weight of your secondary venue floor like NCAA tourney. You raise the floor a bunch, but those bottom row sight lines are useless anyways for stuff like that. So while the Final 4 is rocking above the grass you have lights and irrigation keeping the grass happy underneath. I guess it's a question of strength if that support system being possible? I remember reading about Vegas's structure and they had a similar conundrum because they wanted to maximize seats. Whereas Arizona kept the rollover section as lean as possible, Vegas had to really beef up engineering to hold seats and allow the field to roll under. Then for Tottenham they took the approach of splitting the field. But that seems like a worse option for NFL. eta: I guess he looks at engineering like ballroom dancing...yeah guess what, its not https://www.reviewjournal.com/local/henderson/engineer-in-step-with-changing-las-vegas-landscape/ Otherwise I guess yea, you do the exact same design (basically) as Vegas but in your empty field have some system to erect temporary green structure and artificial lights for Nov-Feb. In either form, probably using GBs hybrid turf is best bet. through an unlikely set of circumstance, I met the structural engineer/contractor who did the seating stations at LV's stadium. My guess is it is over designed due to the fact I had to fire him on a project of my own....because he lost his license 1/2 trough it. He holds several engineering and contracting licenses and the one he lost was not his engineering license that he used for the stadium, but the incompetence remains. Lets hope the Bears design team finds a better option in the Chicago area eta: I guess he thinks engineering is similar to ballroom dancing..yeah guess what its not https://www.reviewjournal.com/local/henderson/engineer-in-step-with-changing-las-vegas-landscape/
  13. i'm sure there are several ways to do it well, the rolling field would even work considering the size of the parcel the Bears bought Grass won't be growing all that well rolled out in November in December. no, but summer/spring/fall months it would grow well and still allow the Bears to use the stadium for other purposes, march madness, concerts, what have you, and not destroy the turf doing so. Plus, a grow-house could be constructed next to the stadium if you want to keep it warm but dormant during the winter
  14. If they go that direction I hope they do it better than SF SF isn't really relevant? Arizona and LV are the only domed teams with grass. For those teams it was a matter of rolling the field out to take advantage of natural sunlight and weather. For Bears probably would be more likely to be some sort of artificial light growing system that keeps it all indoors. No idea if it's really that feasible, but would be awesome. I think there may be a couple soccer clubs that do it? i'm sure there are several ways to do it well, the rolling field would even work considering the size of the parcel the Bears bought
  15. Daniels should have been a good got athletically for the scheme. I guess attitude (or even consistency) are being prioritized. This guy got ARob extension wrong last year, but I feel like maybe he has called other things and is maybe connected? He did have something that he predicted that came true, can't recall what it is. I think you could easily go into 2022 with Borom and Jenkins at RT/RG, as long as you get a versatile veteran as depth/competition. Not sure if JC Tretter is a good option at C with respect to scheme and what his contract demand might be. My take is sign some talented upside/value guys regardless of position and let them sort it out in training camp. Multiple C options would be great. Pushing Borom into a reserve role would be great. I don't understand why Borom would start T over Jenkins. Health?
  16. Not the group I was hoping for. HKS would have been better imo I want a real grass field like Raiders have though. Hope they do it again. If they go that direction I hope they do it better than SF
  17. Not the group I was hoping for. HKS would have been better imo
  18. Also, does this make Heyward expendable, or our new CF?
  19. Between Simmons and (rumored) Rizzo, are anti-vac'rs the new market efficiency?
  20. I don’t know why networks pay these guys. Nobody is tuning in for broadcasters. Umm, well, that's exactly why they pay them, they're desperate
  21. totally on board with that who are the top OL guys available that could be with us for 4-6 years moving forward?
  22. We have Jorge at home, he's got all of the defensive liabilities but maybe not the bat and also he's a ginger You have a red headed son?
  23. I thought he essentially admitted to it?
  24. sad to see Mack go and I'm not at all happy with the return but it is time to rebuild this team quickly
  25. it would be pretty wild, no doubt. but also Pace's rating should still be tempered by his other moves and the fact he had such a high draft pick to begin with. its not like he picked Mitch in the 7th round
×
×
  • Create New...