Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. or, like 1/2 the '85 defense
  2. The report is he grabbed Hoge's throat. I guess I haven't listened enough to Kruetz's talk shows/podcasts/etc enough, but that is shocking to me. I could totally see him stuffing Hoge into a locker being the jock he is, but grabbing Hoge by the throat while doing it is....WOW gtfo Olin
  3. also, I like investing in the secondary. you aren't likely to beat Aaron Rodgers with your offense alone, but if you can contain and minimize him with solid coverage, it gives Fields and the offense less of a hill to climb
  4. I'll give Poles credit and say he must not have seen any o-lineman or wr's in the draft better then what we have or not worth the value of the pick when he picked past the 1st 2nd round pick, meaning he went strictly bpa on a long list of needs. I'm not sure I agree, but whatever. It'll be interesting to see what they do in FA here into training camp.
  5. Yep, some definite self preservation going on it feels like. It drives me crazy. Sure, they didn't draft Fields, but they were hired (presumably) with the idea they could build a team with him. Sure, if Fields fails after real investment and planning for the guys around him, you couldn't blame Poles. But as it is, Fields failure would be impossible to separate Pokes from. In a way, Poles has staked his career in Chicago to Fields success by NOT supporting him.
  6. Cordell Patterson #2 if we absolutely hit 100% on him
  7. Wait what? See what?
  8. Mel Kiper is looking unbelievable max hedroom tonight
  9. Beginning to wonder about that as well, I can understand the pick at 39 but, not going offense with the latest pick is pretty disappointing. This defense, defense, defense nonsense is really tiresome. Im fine with the picks so far. It's likely been their two BPAs at two positions of need and likely game 1 starters. Say that when Fields is on a horsefeathering stretcher
  10. Wtg Poles Again: NEVER take anyone from KC
  11. I'm not Uber excited to see us not help Fields today
  12. Gordon opp Johnson, I'll take it
  13. I'm not really interested in moving down at all, I feel like there is still some quality for Poles to grab (as raw is pointing out) with his 2nd's, that's exactly what he should do
  14. Mafe would be a fun pick
  15. this is the first draft since before the Urlacher/Brown draft that I'm generally not interested in go bears?
  16. This is the bad thing about not moving on from Pace/Nagy a year earlier. Assume we shed the bad contracts last year, committed to Fields for all of lest season, allowed him an entire season of snaps/development in the new system. Picking up a guy like Deebo could be an option then, but I agree with raw that paying in trade and contract is unlikely. The chatter about WR's demanding so much cap and therefore drafting a receiver is a better option is funny to me. Of course drafting a high performing reciever is better than trade/high dollar extension. It's the same for every position and not as easy as it seems. Thing is, if they moved on from Pace/Nagy after 2020, Poles or whoever the new GM would have been, probably doesn't trade up for Fields last year. All new GMs are big on talking "build thru the draft". I don't see anyone coming in and making a bold move like giving up a future pick for Fields. That's basically tying your tenure as a GM to Fields. And if he fails, you're looking at 3 years on the job at most. I mean why do anything? there are risks involved!!
  17. I realize you're being logical raw, but the lack of entertaining moves by Poles really annoys me.
  18. I don't think you know what "perennial" means
  19. I don't really think it has much validity, but also the moves they have made to date are not equivalent to many other moves teams make around a 2nd year QB historically. The big difference of course being regime change. It is gonna be easier for Poles to cut bait. He doesn't have to tie his stakes to Fields. That's plainly factual. Yeah and honestly, it's probably the smart way to play it. Pace put all his eggs in the Trubisky basket and went big to win with him in his rookie contract window in 2018 (Mack, ARob, paying players already on the team). If Poles did that and Fields wasn't the guy, that's basically a waste of time. If Fields shows what they expect him to, they can be the 2021 Bengals or 2020 Bills really quick. They will have the money and/or draft pick ammunition to add almost whoever they want with Fields. Pace had a top 5 D to pair with Trubisky. That's a pretty good bet to make since you have 1/2 of the team already at top performance. If Trubisky hits big, the Bears are real good. Poles has Fields,,,,,,and that's about it. He has to build SOMETHING
  20. Does Suzuki get his own thread or is it too soon? He's started on a tear and it's fantastic to see
  21. Who would they sell it to? MLB is not going to let some free-spending, paradigm shifting group come in and change the way things are done. Mark Cuban wasn't allowed to buy the team for a reason and there are now specific rules in place to combat Steve Cohen's spending. After all the lockout back and forth I find it very hard to believe MLB would let an owner in who "wanted to win" over "wanting to make money". NYY Boston Doyers In that order
  22. We look like we found a bag of St. Louis pixie dust Beautiful blast by Suzuki also
  23. I hope you're right raw
×
×
  • Create New...