While in general I understand and agree with what you wrote, so far we haven't heard any disparaging comments from Daboll about Fields (that I've seen anyway) but we have heard/seen reports of Flores and Watson shacking up. As a result, what you wrote is pure guessing, and I tend to think the opposite is more likely to be true: the best bet IS Daboll. It doesn't seem that hard to understand at all. Yes, what I wrote was pure guessing. That was the point of the post. Daboll makes sense, but the reason for not going him that would also make sense is what I wrote. We aren't going to hear comments from Daboll saying he doesn't like Fields now. I think given the direction of the NFL and their rules (focused on promoting the passing game and the QB), it doesn't make sense to simply go against hiring a guy like Daboll for a bunch of reasons. The only reason would be if Daboll either didn't like Fields (and there is no proof of that) or he simply wasn't available. All other reasons are pointless overthink, imo