Easier said than done, we're required to have 4 WR and RB, and 2 QB, TE, K, and DEF. We start 2 RB and WR, and one of everyone else, the backups serve only to fill in in the starters bye weeks. We can't have any more than the allotted amount of players for each position. So I can't drop my backup kicker or defense and pick up another QB or RB. The league is set up to avoid cherry picker drafters who will pick all the best players of a certain position to give them an unfair advantage in trading for players. It takes that strategy away from people who may think of drafting a bunch of one position early on in hopes of trading their excess for other teams better players at other positions When you have 12 teams selecting 4 WR and RB over the course of 16 rounds... there tends to be a big lump of crap around round 7 or 8. Maurice Morris will be solely a fill in when Larry Johnson or Westbrook have a bye week, and he was one of the only RB's left on the board who was actually still pegged as the starting RB for a team. Actually, he was the last RB on the board with that distinction. Actually, Ahman Green will get the fill in before him, so he's solely a "If he performs well, lucky me" pick. Effective WR's were pretty much gone by round 7 as well I can't stand leagues like that. Its worse in baseball. Had a league with strict pitchers settings. Couldn't pick up Joba when he became a starter because he was a RP and SP. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see someone like Seattle pick up Travis Henry after week one or two when their run game is awful.