Well Gordon's mediocre years were the years he spent acclimating to major league baseball after being one of the most hyped prospects of the 2000's. Between him and Matt Wieters, scouts and analysts were hyping them up like they were gonna be the GOAT of their era it seemed like. It took Gordon a few years to find his groove and in 2011 that's when he started being a consistent, valuable MLB player. It was also the year he became a full time LF'er, after being moved off 3B in the middle of 2010. Since being in LF Gordon has arguably been one of the best overall left fielders in baseball. His 2015 doesn't look as good as Fowler's because his numbers were down this past season due to his injury most likely. He had a Grade 2 groin strain in July and was out until September. There was a stretch from the middle of September to the end of the season where he slumped and went 10 for 56 (.178 AVG). Could be plausible that the groin issue was preventing him from going max effort, but the fact is his offensive production suffered and really knocked his numbers down a peg. He was probably headed to the ASG before his injury (was batting .279 with 11 HR on July 9th) and probably would've finished consistently with his previous numbers. Only thing about Gordon that worries me is his age (he'll be 32 in 2 months) and, as such, how big his contract will be. I have the utmost confidence in his abilities to be productive and valuable, I just have no clue how long it will last before he starts declining due to his age and since he's been one of the most valuable LF'ers in baseball, how many years that's going to put the Cubs on the hook for if they can sign him. Also, Soler's offensive profile is pretty different from Gordon's so comparing the two is kinda like apples and oranges. Soler has been profiled as one of the strongest hitters in the game and if/when he can figure it out he'll likely be a 30HR type of guy, but Gordon is never gonna be that guy. At his absolute best I'd expect Soler to put up at least one .900+ OPS season with a bunch more in the mid .800's or higher, Gordon is more of a mid-high .700's to mid .800's OPS guy with stellar defense type player, which is immensely valuable in his environment. They're kinda two different players so it's hard to compare the two, IMO. Plus if Soler still ends up needing a couple years before he starts consistently mashing (it took world destroying super prospect Alex Gordon 4 years to find his stroke so anything is possible), the difference between Soler and Gordon could be a chasm of WAR. Gordon has been worth 25.2 fWAR over the previous 5 seasons (and was worth 6.6 just a year earlier in 2014). We know that Gordon would provide immediate value and instantly help the team win vs. waiting for Soler to figure it out which could be next year or it could be two years from now. He's a bit of a wild card at this point. He looked good to end the year this season, but he looked good at the end of 2014, too, and we can see how well his 2015 went. To me, if singing Gordon means Soler has to go, it basically comes down to whether or not you want the immediate confidence you get in putting Gordon out there, or rolling the dice and hoping Soler is more feast instead of famine. I'm kinda torn either way. Love Soler and what he can do, but we can't see the future. If we knew it was gonna take a couple more years for him to piece it together, I'd rather have Gordon and trade Soler while he still has some big value to help the team elsewhere. But Soler is the type of player who might end up crushing 30 dongs next year and you don't want to miss out on those early years of affordable power. It's a bothersome predicament.