As shnsajax already pointed out, the basic business model of MLS may be part of the problem. Just to illustrate: Eden Hazard started his playing career with his hometown/village club (Stade Brainoise) like most young players and was subsequently picked up by the "bigger" club in the region (Tubize, currently in the Belgian second division). When he was 14, he was poached away by Lille to join their academy and the rest is history. Now here's the crucial part: under UEFA rules, both Stade Braine and Tubize get paid a part of subsequent transfer fees as a "training fee" for the formative years he spent with them. They don't control their youth players (on their 16th birthday, a player can sign a contract with any club they like), but they do maintain a financial interest in developing them. Romelu Lukaku has a similar story; he joined Rupel Boom when he was 5 years old (my youngest is the same age and did train there a couple of times, for all I know they may have played together at some point). He moved to Lierse (easily the best youth system in the country, by quite a margin) when he was 9, and joined Anderlecht when he was 13. (caveat: his dad was a professional soccer player, so all those moves were probably carefully thought through with a long term goal in mind). As for exuberant transfer demands from the "holding" club: since the Bosman arrest, a player can free himself from contractual obligations with a fixed financial penalty (and a waiting time) - that has changed a lot in the European soccer landscape (a bit similar to free agency in MLB)