Man, I'd love to get him without giving up Hill. That would be a nasty rotation 1-4. Left handed heavy, but yes, it would be dominating. My concern is it would be nice to go back and forth. So you'd have to have Z not start the opener. So if this did happen, you'd go LRLRL Bedard Z Lilly Marquis Hill Who's starting in between Hill and Bedard? I hate this "reasoning" that you can't have back to back lefties in the rotation. Yes there are more righties than lefties in any given batting order. Don't you think these guys have been facing these same batting orders their whole careers? In the same way, I see no reason with the obsession of having a lefty in the rotation or a lefty in the batting lineup. 8 best hitters, 5 best pitchers, let em throw and hit with whatever they want as long as they do it well. 100% true. I can almost (really almost) see wanting a diverse hitting line-up if only to make opposing teams burn through their bull-pens in late innings (but not if it means starting a worse player). How does going RLR with pitchers who appear in totally different games and maybe even against different teams help at all. Also, it seems like the Cubs worry more about RL match-ups based on like league average results instead of player specific stats. If a left-handed bat clobbers left-handed pitching, who cares if he swings the bat with his left hand or his wiener (can I say dick on this forum)?