The premise though, if it's the article I'm thinking of, truly looks at it as most valuable player, and there is a good argument to be made that without Jay, the Bears would be near the bottom of the league because the offense would be so dreadful without him running it due to such poor line play and Campbell (or McCown or whomever) being generally terrible. Now, it's not voted on as if it's most valuable but rather best statistics by a QB unless someone else has an historic season, but the idea of Jay truly being the most valuable has merit.