Derwood

We'll see. I just think it's funny how fast the draft experts change their opinions. They do it in the same draft (remember how 6'3", 225lb Mitch Trubisky was a prototypical QB build while 6'3", 225lb LaMar Jackson was too sleight and should change to WR?)

So is Gonzales' phone camera bad, or is he just secretly banned from the facility and is zooming in on people from across the parking lot

Its just funny that the people who said Baker Mayfield at 6'0" was too short are all over Murray's jock Wait for it, it will dawn on him Apparently not, which is why I'm asking the question

Someone explain to me why everyone is drooling over this guy. I get that he won the Heisman, but so have a million other great college QB's that had zero success in the NFL. Why do draft experts think that 5'10" Murray is going to take the league by storm? He is ridiculously talented. Very intelligent QB, super fast, great arm strength. The problem is that he is too small for the NFL. I highly doubt he gets measured at the combine but I don’t think he’s even 5’10” and possibly under 190 pounds. He is going to get killed on an NFL field. Its just funny that the people who said Baker Mayfield at 6'0" was too short are all over Murray's jock

Someone explain to me why everyone is drooling over this guy. I get that he won the Heisman, but so have a million other great college QB's that had zero success in the NFL. Why do draft experts think that 5'10" Murray is going to take the league by storm?

Is he firmly committed to a late growth spurt, because the dude is short. Like, short short.

There may be some strategy to it now and then, but I certainly understand why pitchers who have contract bonuses based on games started (for example) would strongly oppose this trend.

When Harper signs for 7/$240M, where can I get injectable forehead heroin at a friendly discount?

bWAR hates Harper's defense (4.2 oWAR, -3.2 dWAR last season) Yes, I am aware. Thank you, Derwood. Just sharing information, psycho

bWAR hates Harper's defense (4.2 oWAR, -3.2 dWAR last season)

Adding the DH bumps the average salaries up a smidge. The average DH made around $7.5 million AAV last year....what does the average middle reliever make?

Spring training never gets me excited, because it’s long and stupid. Ask me again a week before opening day

He Diet No More

Mystery Team = Reporter has no idea, but can take credit later when a team they never reported on signs him

It seems clear now that Machado and Harper didn't want to upstage the NFL playoffs. Now that the Super Bowl is over, they are sure to sign any minute now. Any.....minute

Patriots 13 Maroon 5 Rams 3

Free agency is fine. Fix prearb I hear this stuff and am very recently coming to realize that often the intention is to take from the older players to give to the younger players. While I can’t assume that is what you mean, that can also burn in hell It's very simple: players are grossly underpaid in their prime years, so they ask for monster contracts to make up for it in their post-prime years. Owners are now cooling on those mega-contracts, so they are setting up a system that they don't pay the players in either case. The Bryants and Betts and Lindors of the world should be getting paid more earlier in their careers

Yes, but they are up against a mountain of dumb contracts that owners have signed off on in recent years that is now making everyone nervous about laying out 10 years. It's not fair, but every contract from Pujols to Hosmer is stacking up against Harper and Machado's demands. Smart people realize that Harper =/= Hosmer, but owners are using those bad decisions as an excuse to not back the Brinks truck up for the guys who actually deserve it They're making horsefeathers up because they realized they can game the system based off of the horsefeathers player negotiations from the last collective bargaining agreement; stop with your tortured caveats that basically amount to, "look, this is BS, but I can actually kinda see where they're coming from with this BS, so they're not all wrong." The vast majority of teams could easily afford either guy and are simply either choosing not to try (and a bunch of those are simply choosing not to try at anything besides being awful, period), or trying to lowball a couple of generational talents like THAT'S inexplicably the way to course correct shelling out for much older and much worse players (when most of the time those "bad contracts" either paid off or broken even or came pretty damn close; the truly bad ones are still the obvious exceptions and not the rule). Plus it's ridiculous to continually say things like, "nervous about laying out 10 years;" nobody is ACTUALLY paying for either for a decade unless something goes really wrong and they don't opt out well before then. They're horsefeathering disingenuous scum acting like they're locking themselves into a 8 or 10-year deal with a couple of guys this good and this young (nevermind how ridiculous it is to be hemming and hawing even if they WERE actually locking in with guys, again, this good and this young). AGAIN, I'm neither siding with nor excusing the owners. I'm just looking at the reality of the BS circumstances that the owners have created that is depressing the market on Harper and Machado. They have very effectively convinced the common baseball fan that Luxury Tax=Salary Cap, and they've put profit margins above winning. For a small handful of teams, spending this money on these players makes no sense (the Marlins, for example, would not get a good ROI on either, because their entire franchise sucks), but most teams are simply deciding that nickeling and dimeing their way to 75 wins is an acceptable business model

Waves and waves (of Iowa shuttle middle relievers)

Both guys are only 26, and have been each worth approx. $236 million in about 7-ish seasons of play apiece. Yes, but they are up against a mountain of dumb contracts that owners have signed off on in recent years that is now making everyone nervous about laying out 10 years. It's not fair, but every contract from Pujols to Hosmer is stacking up against Harper and Machado's demands. Smart people realize that Harper =/= Hosmer, but owners are using those bad decisions as an excuse to not back the Brinks truck up for the guys who actually deserve it

Am I supposed to know who this is? one of the more prominent cubs bloggers who has claimed sources before Why does no one post his tweets but we have 87 Charles the Cat tweets?

Am I supposed to know who this is?

No, I've never said that spending money on these players is bad, and I'm not (never) siding with ownership. I'm just pointing out that Harper's particular demands limit his pool of interested teams, and he has to decide if that's worth the record contract. I wish it wasn't that way It's an imaginary, arbitrary pool. Not if the owners have collectively decided that profit margins >>>>> winning

Judging by online reactions it appears fans are quite content with the spending money is stupid idea. These same goofs would definitely rage at Theo for not sealing the deal if we were actively pursuing case in point No, I've never said that spending money on these players is bad, and I'm not (never) siding with ownership. I'm just pointing out that Harper's particular demands limit his pool of interested teams, and he has to decide if that's worth the record contract. I wish it wasn't that way

I mean, that's on him, though, right? He can sign anywhere he likes so long as he drops his demands from "richest contract in history" to "unbelievable, generational wealth"