Derwood
-
Posts
88,623 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
93
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Derwood
-
A&M should have got one board. good point
-
shot too soon
-
now THIS is a ref screw job
-
can't ask for two better games to start the night
-
how can you give up that many offensive rebounds? man oh man
-
wow, another point blank miss on a layup. unbelievable
-
your guys played a heck of a game. I'd be proud if my school played that hard against KU. Oh wait, my school beat KU. But my team didnt' make it to the tourney, so you're still in better shape. If your team didn't make the routny you shouldn't be talking about them in the tourny thread. A bit hypocritical no? oh shut up Nice. Yet the mods tell the Illinois and Indiana fans to let it go. But you can take a shot at us, then attack a poster by telling them to shut up. if you can't tell the difference between one off the cuff remark about my school (in a post that was praising SIU) and your 100's of posts about IU and UofI (in several threads) I don't know what to tell you
-
your guys played a heck of a game. I'd be proud if my school played that hard against KU. Oh wait, my school beat KU. But my team didnt' make it to the tourney, so you're still in better shape. If your team didn't make the routny you shouldn't be talking about them in the tourny thread. A bit hypocritical no? oh shut up
-
your guys played a heck of a game. I'd be proud if my school played that hard against KU. Oh wait, my school beat KU. But my team didnt' make it to the tourney, so you're still in better shape.
-
Not completely. i still don't believe in refs deciding games. it's easy to say refs are calling against your team when you're biased for your team. same goes with people saying announcers hate their team. they only hear the bad things about their team and not the other I want KU to win. So how am I being biased? all i'm saying is that if SIU loses, it will be due to missed layups, not the refs and there's no guarantee they lose if KU keeps shooting free throws like the Illini (sorry, couldn't help myself) So the game wouldn't be different if they waved off Julian Wright's dunk in the first half and got the goaltending call when Tatum was fouled in the second half? In such a close game, that could have been the difference - SIU isn't afforded the chances that KU was. different? sure, but a lot of the game would be different. you can't assume that every other play in the game would have been the same had those two calls not been made I didn't assume anything. i think you know what i'm saying
-
good game. I was rooting for SIU, but KU was the winner in my bracket.
-
Not completely. i still don't believe in refs deciding games. it's easy to say refs are calling against your team when you're biased for your team. same goes with people saying announcers hate their team. they only hear the bad things about their team and not the other I want KU to win. So how am I being biased? all i'm saying is that if SIU loses, it will be due to missed layups, not the refs and there's no guarantee they lose if KU keeps shooting free throws like the Illini (sorry, couldn't help myself) So the game wouldn't be different if they waved off Julian Wright's dunk in the first half and got the goaltending call when Tatum was fouled in the second half? In such a close game, that could have been the difference - SIU isn't afforded the chances that KU was. different? sure, but a lot of the game would be different. you can't assume that every other play in the game would have been the same had those two calls not been made
-
falker traveled, but it doesn't matter
-
Quick 2 and a foul. i agree
-
so, quick 2 and foul, or shoot the 3?
-
Not completely. i still don't believe in refs deciding games. it's easy to say refs are calling against your team when you're biased for your team. same goes with people saying announcers hate their team. they only hear the bad things about their team and not the other I want KU to win. So how am I being biased? all i'm saying is that if SIU loses, it will be due to missed layups, not the refs and there's no guarantee they lose if KU keeps shooting free throws like the Illini (sorry, couldn't help myself)
-
Not completely. i still don't believe in refs deciding games. it's easy to say refs are calling against your team when you're biased for your team. same goes with people saying announcers hate their team. they only hear the bad things about their team and not the other
-
big shot. and there was a non-call on a possible charge that went SIU's way, so the refs are evening things out
-
slipping away here salukis............
-
ok, SIU won't win if they miss layups
-
no one touched Rush at all. These refs have hosed SIU. but SIU has initiated a ton of contact on other plays with no call, so it balances out
-
Not a chance in hell (thats where jack buck is btw) And Darryl Kile because he smoked weed. And Jim Edmonds (not yet, but soon) and willie mcgee, just cuz he's too ugly for heaven
-
Did it? I didn't think so but I also did not get a good look at the replay. Is that something the refs can review during the timeout? Yeah, that replay confirmed that it hit the rim. It's a tough call to make, but the refs have made a few other bad calls in favor of KU (no shot clock violation on the Wright dunk, no goaltend). I highly doubt refs make calsl for or against teams in 99/100 situations (the 100th being every duke game)
-
if i could find the monologue from "Take Me Out" online I'd post it.
-
Horford Horford Horford. I would love that. Thirded. Horford's going to dominate. :x That's the correct usage. you got me before I edited :)
