1) And it also raises concerns about how well he'll hit for us 2) Incentive for them not to trade him cheaply 3) More incentive not to trade him cheaply 4) Even more incentive not to trade him cheaply 5) Good point 6) I don't put huge stock in a couple hundred ABs a year, but it is nice 7) True 8) Again, true 9) He's never played it before, so I wonder if he could 1) Hes not Bobby Scales 2) Hes not Ryan Freel 3) Hes not Aaron Miles He's also not that good overall and will likely cost more than he's worth in terms of prospects. But again, if he does in fact come cheap, I'm perfectly fine with a trade. I just don't think he'll come cheap enough. And again, Scales is getting on base at a perfectly fine rate right now. He just needs to play over the Miles/Freel duo. The problem with Scales/Miles/Freel is that until Lou gives one of them the job, there all going to be in limbo. Granted, Id rather the trade, but if thats not going to happen, one of those 3 need to be made the full time starter, make 1 a backup, and dump the 3rd and call up Jake Fox as a Daryl Ward type who will be nothing more than a bat off the bench. IMHO, none of that trio will be significantly better than the other 2, but if given that vote of confidence that they will have the everyday job, that could make them at least productive. ETA: ^By process of elimination, that job goes to Ryan Freel. yay.