I understand how these types of trades work, but the fact is you're still trading a productive pitcher (Z) for a completely unproductive middle infielder playing third base (Figgins). There is very little to no indication that Figgins is even going to be up to his 2010 standards, much less be of any real value to the team. With Silva there was some reason to think that with a good pitching coach he had the stuff to become at least a mediocre pitcher. Figgins is a 34 year old guy who's never had power, has lost all his patience, and is getting to the point where speed and athleticism will not help him at all. There simply is no upside whatsoever to bringing in Figgins and by giving Z away for him, you tie up a roster space that could be better given to a young guy who has some upside (LeMaheieu or Marwin). I absolutely agree with your thinking, but much like with the Bradley situation, if they've made the decision that Z can no longer be a part of the ball club, there's nothing that any of us can do about it. The reason I think that Figgins a is logical option is that the money is very similar and we've already done a similar type of swap with the Ms. There arent many options. Even when you go over the bad contract pool, most of them either have more money or more years on them, and it really doesn't make sense to swap him for a worse player with a worse contract.